Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Paleo Conservative

AND the '47 can go into existing, unmodified airports/ gates. The '47 also meets noise requirements which the Airbus is rumoured to fail badly.


7 posted on 03/27/2006 4:58:59 AM PST by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Blueflag
The best thing about the 747-8 is the fact that you don't need the enormous expense of building 80 x 80 meter gates with dual-level jet bridges like you need with the A380-800. Also, the range the 747-8 (8,000 nautical miles still-air) is enough to fly most of the world's long-range city pairs, too.

I think it's likely that both British Airways and Japan Airlines--already large 747-400 operators--will end up buying the 747-8 instead of the A380-800 because both airlines have far less landing slot restrictions at their home airports (London Heathrow for British Airways and Tokyo Narita for Japan Airlines).

18 posted on 03/27/2006 6:42:27 PM PST by RayChuang88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson