Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daniel Pipes, the expert of hate (The Muslim Brotherhood Speaks -- Breakout the BARF Bags)
The Muslim Brotherhood ^ | 27 March 2006 | The Muslim Brotherhood

Posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:02 PM PST by Cornpone

Omnipresent expert in television studios and regular commentator of American mainstream newspapers, Daniel Pipes has become the world theorist of the Islamphobia. The son of Richard Pipes, the Sovietologist that resumed the arms race during the Ford Administration, and spiritual son of Robert Strausz-Hupé, the visionary of the new world order, Daniel Pipes, directs a lot of strategic institutes. He is the founder of currently common concepts such as «new anti-Semitism», «militants of Islam» and «conspiracy theories». An advocate of the annihilation of Palestinians, he has been appointed by George W. Bush director of the US Institute of Peace.

Between September 11, 2001 and September 11, 2002, Daniel Pipes became one of the main American commentators focused on terrorism and Islam. According to an analysis made by The Nation, which has just spoken about him in a very caustic way [1], during that period he appeared in 110 television shows and 450 radio programs. His editorials have been welcomed by the Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, whereas the New York Post has included him among its journalists.

The Pipes Dynasty This sudden mediatic glory is not casual. It is the result of his personal talent, an extensive formation and the prestigious sponsors he has. He plays a key role in the political strategy of the neoconservatives who govern in Washington and Tel Aviv. To understand this career, we have to go back 30 years in time. In order to put an end to the Watergate crisis and the personal conflicts it provoked, President Gerald Ford took drastic measures in regards with the several republican trends that supported him.

On November 3, 1975, he got rid of his Secretary of Defense, James Schlesinger, and of countless collaborators. These measures were mockingly called the “Massacre of Halloween”. After this, Ford surrounded himself with a very limited number of officials who were actually the same ones that took power in year 2001: he appointed Dick Cheney Secretary General of the White House; Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, and George H. Bush (father), director of the CIA [2]. A press campaign organized by friendly associations alerted then the public opinion to the underestimation of the red danger on the part of the CIA. By making people believe he had yield to pressures, President Ford authorized the creation of an independent committee to assess the Soviet threat. Its director was Harvard professor Richard Pipes.

He formed a team, known as Team B, which was made up by the staunchest supporters of the Cold War, among which we have General Lyman Lemnite [3] and young Paul Wolfowitz. It was like this that the Pipes’ Report, published in Commentary, the magazine of the American Jewish Committee founded by Irving Kristol, allowed the Ford Administration to resume the arms race. Richard Pipes had a firstborn child: Daniel. He studied the history of Medieval Islam in Harvard and distinguished himself in the university for his opposition to the leftist demonstrations against the Vietnam War.

In 1981 he published Slave Soldiers and Islam, his first work, an academic and well-documented masterpiece where his political convictions were still not present. It was written before the 1979 Iranian Islamic revolution, the fact that would mark the birth of the analyst’s convictions. In 1982, when his father Richard joined the Reagan’s administration, Daniel Pipes did the same thing and worked for the analysis team of the State Department. He devoted a lot of time to his second book, In the Path of God, which was published in 1983 and increased his concerns with regards to Muslim fundamentalism by following its escalation in a dozen of States. A phenomenon that, according to him, was extremely directed to the oil incomes Arab states began to have after the war in Kippur.

A Compromised Intellectual After leaving the State Department in 1983, Daniel Pipes worked as a professor in several universities, such as the United States Naval War College, but he felt he was marginalized in the academic field. He stopped publishing university texts and chose to write articles focused on several teams: terrorism, Israel, the case of Salman Rushdie, which he published in Commentary [4]. His options have not always been the best: he exaggeratedly praised the merits of manuscript From Time Immemorial, a work about the Zionist colonization of Palestine written by Joan Peters.

However, his book was very criticized by some important journalists who analyzed its blatant lies, its obvious mistakes and its plagiarism. Pipes’ interest on the Israeli issue began to come to the surface step by step. After criticizing the mediatic treatment given to the war in Lebanon, which damaged Israel’s image, in 1988 he published an article in the New York Times where he rejected the idea of a Palestinian State that would be a «nightmare» for its inhabitants: according to him, such solution would «affect Arabs more than Israelis» because Palestinians would be forced to live under the control of a terrorist organization, Yasser Arafat’s PLO. However, Daniel Pipes could not be considered as an unconditional supporter of the Israeli government. He has actually criticized it sometimes, especially when he has reproached it for not repressing Palestinian populations enough. Pipes believes Palestinians must be annihilated and he has accused academicians such as Rashid Khalidi of making statements justifying violence. According to Juan Cole, professor at the University of Michigan, «one of the things Pipes means when he accuses university professors of supporting terrorism, is that we reject his approach to see all Palestinians as terrorists.».

Robert Strausz-HupéBy the mid 80s, Pipes moved to Philadelphia where he became director of the Foreign Policy Research Institute - FPRI of the University of Pennsylvania, an institution created by geopolitician Robert Strausz-Hupé who would be became its eminence grise. Founded in 1955, the institute has been publishing magazine Orbis since 1957.

Its first number included Strausz-Hupé’s manifesto: L’Equilibre de demain [5]. In it he expressed the following: «Should the coming world order be an American universal empire? It should be for it would hallmark the American spirit. The coming order would be the last phase of a historical transition and it would put an end to the revolutionary period of this century. The mission of the American people is to eliminate nation-States, to lead hopeless countries to form wider unions and stop, through its power, the trifling attempts to sabotage the new world order for they offer mankind nothing but a corrupted ideology and brute force…For the next fifty years, the future belongs to the United States. The American empire and mankind would have no clashes, but would be two names for a same universal order guided by peace and happiness. Novus orbis terranum (New world order)». Later, Daniel Pipes published again this manifesto. From 1986 to 1993, Daniel Pipes was editor in chief of Orbis. During these years, he published several articles in it welcoming the support of Iraq against Iran, such as the one titled The Baghdad Alternative by Laurie Mylroie [6]. In addition, and along with this young woman, he wrote an article in The New Republic about this topic too [7]. In 1990 he published an article in the National Review titled “Muslims are Coming! Muslims are Coming!” in which he expressed his alarmist opinions about this issue. He wrote: «Western Europe societies are not well prepared for a massive immigration of people of matt skin that cook rare dishes and do not follow German hygienic norms [8]». In this period, his books and articles distinguished themselves for its extremely hard positions criticizing Arab countries, whether it was Syria, Iran or even Saudi Arabia, a Washington’s ally. Since then, he alerted to the threat «Muslims of the United States» would represent for the American security. Thus, in an article published in Commentary he opposed the «prerogatives» given to Muslim American organizations due to the discrimination they said they suffered [9].

By supporting his friend Steven Emerson’s idea, who is also an expert on terrorism, Daniel Pipes told the «USA Today» that the 1995 attack in Oklahoma City proved the West was being attacked and fundamentalists «were targeting them». In 1990, Daniel Pipes founded a section of the FPRI, the Middle East Forum (MEF) to «promote the American interests in the region». In 1994, it became an independent association that some time later published the Middle East Quarterly and, since 1999, the Middle East Intelligence Bulletin [10].

In 1997, Daniel Pipes was involved in the creation of the US Committee for a Free Lebanon (USCFL) along with banker Ziad K. Abdelnur, an expert of the Middle East Forum. Daniel Pipes and the experts of the FPRI, the MEF and the USCFL were very active in the work of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy (WINEP) where the most outstanding hawks and the cream of Likud gathered [11].

Daniel Pipes became famous as a hunter of the «fifth column» that emerged in American universities. In 2002, he created a section of the MEF, the Campus Watch, «an organization openly aimed at reporting the wrong analysis and the political distortions regarding Middle East studies». According to The Nation, one of the first measures taken by the organization was to open «McCarthy-styled-files» to the different professors they suspected were not quite pro-Israel. As a result, more than a hundred academicians contacted the Campus Watch for they wanted their names to be added to the list. This made Daniel Pipes furious and he described them as «advocates of the suicide attacks and the militant Islam». Likewise, he used other terms such as «self-hating» or «anti-Americans». In an article titled Americans at Universities who hate the United States, he made fun of all those who, like Noam Chomsky, has denounced the American intervention in Iraq refusing to see the «direct threat» that Saddam Hussein represented to the United States. To spread the idea that academicians and students were blind regarding the Islamic threat, he counted on Martin Kramer’s assistance, current editor in chief of the Middle East Quarterly and the Stanley Kurtz, a member of the Hoover Institution and collaborator of the National Review Online.

According to The Nation, his theses had an exceptional mediatic coverage from «the MSNBC to the NPR». The Washington Post devoted its first page to him and even the debate made it to the Congress: a project to create a consultative committee, whose members appointed by the government would be in charge of supervising the related-to-the-Near-East- educational programs financed with federal funds to thousand of students, was being analyzed. From that moment on, all programs had to «include all viewpoints» and not «only the criticism against the American foreign policy», as explained by Stanley Kurtz in the House of Representatives in June 2003 [12].

Daniel Pipes was recently included in the list Jewish diary The Forward makes with the names of the 50 most influential American Jewish [13]. His appointment to the US Institute of Peace (USIP) made by President Bush has upset the Muslim community, especially the Muslim Public Affairs Council. This financed-by-federal-funds-think tank is aimed at promoting «a pacific solution to international conflicts», a concept that has nothing to do with Daniel Pipes political thought: actually, in February 2002, Pipes wrote that «diplomacy rarely ended conflicts» [14]. Just after joining the USIP he focused in purging the list of collaborators. Thus, he excluded the Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy which, according to him, was a pro-terrorist group infiltrated into the venerable public institution [15]. He left the USIP at the beginning of 2005.

The thinker of Islamphobia Daniel Pipes is the author of several concepts that have been imposed in the public debate. Above all, he is the inventor of the «New Anti-Semitism» [16]. This term is used to identify the opposition of American Muslim pressure groups against American Jewish pressure groups regarding the Palestinian issue. It is an amalgam between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism that has been quite used lately. He is also the inventor of the «Militants of Islam» [17]. The expression identifies those Muslims who, not satisfied with their domestic prayers, join community organizations and defend the rights of the Palestinians to the detriment of the Israelis supported by the United States. It creates a new amalgam between Muslim identity, the struggle against the State of Israel, and the challenging of Washington’s policy. This presents those Americans of Muslim religion as traitors, mainly.

Finally, he invented «the Middle East complot theory». The Arabs, who refuse to accept their incapacity to solve their problems, imagine they are victims of Western complots [18]. In 2002, Daniel Pipes went to all radio and television stations to campaign against The Great Imposture, a work about September 11 attacks and the change of regime that took place in the United States afterwards [19]. By having no arguments at all to oppose this book and wrongly believing the author was Arab, he made emphasis in seeing it as an example of the conspiracy of Arab intellectuals living in France. His judgment was used in France by Guillaume Dasquié and Jean Guisnel [20] and later by Daniel Leconte [21].

In 2003, he was invited to the most important Arab political show, The Opposite Direction(Al-Jazeera), to participate in a debate with Thierry Meyssan. Yet, he couldn’t go for he was waiting for his USIP appointment confirmation by the Congress. To replace him, he sent his loyal assistant, Jonathan Schanzer [22] who couldn’t refute the debated book. In France, Pipes counted also on the help of his translator, Guy Milliére, to spread his ideas. He published «Ce que veut Bush», an apologetic work based on interviews with Daniel Pipes, Paul Wolfowitz, etc. [23].

Daniel Pipes’ obsession is Islamphobia. In 1999 he published an article in The Forward where he stated: «Muslims who hate the United States and, especially, the Jewish people living there, are increasing and they are becoming more powerful thanks to the protection that the democracy and the indulgence of a pluralist and charitable society offer to them». September 11 attacks strengthened the convictions of this analyst and increased his supporters too. For him, 9/11 allowed him to publish in 2002 Militant Islam Reaches America, an up-to-that-moment «unpublishable» book that alerted to the fact that Muslim American populations included an «important number» of people that «supported the goals of the planes hijackers», that «hated the United States and, after all, wanted to turn it into a Muslim country». Jim Lobe, of Inter-Press Service agency, has said he received a proposal of a subsidy project in which Daniel Pipes proposed the creation of «The Islamic Progress Institute» that «could work on a moderate, modern and pro-American approach» on behalf of the Muslim community. According to him, Muslim fundamentalists were «Nazis», «potential murderers», that represented a «real threat» for Jewish, Christians, women and homosexuals.

The war in Iraq has been the moment of glory for Daniel Pipes’ theories for it has been «a unique opportunity to replace the most violent regime of the world». Since the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Pipes has spoken about this issue and has actually stated that Iraq would need a «strong man with a democratic spirit» for Iraqis «have the conspiracy theory in their minds» and are not ready to govern themselves as Westerners do. Even today, in the New York Sun, he has said the name of the person he would like to see in such a post. The fact that this person is a military man is not surprising. Former major general Jassim Mohammed Saleh al-Dulaimi is known for not participating in the atrocities committed by Saddam Hussein’s regime as well as not having radical ideological convictions and his well known social position [24].


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: daniel; danielpipes; documentary; ikhwan; islam; muslim; muslims; obsession; obsessionthemovie; pipes

1 posted on 03/27/2006 6:03:06 PM PST by Cornpone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Land_of_Lincoln_John; EBH; Chgogal; evad; American in Israel; Grut; Bombardier; CarrotAndStick; ...

Ping...


2 posted on 03/27/2006 6:04:12 PM PST by Cornpone (Remember 11 Sept 2001 -- This generation's Pearl Harbor, its Alamo, its battleship Maine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Yikes.


3 posted on 03/27/2006 6:09:24 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
"...he appointed Dick Cheney Secretary General of the White House..."
Their [former?] patrons and masters show. The White House is not a Politburo [at least, it is organized differently], but they have been conditioned to see everything in the terms familiar to them.
4 posted on 03/27/2006 6:10:36 PM PST by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Read Hugh's Radio Blog today and saw that a new movie will be coming out.

http://www.radioblogger.com/#001500

Friday, March 24

Frank Gaffney the film critic?

Obsession: Radical Islam's War Against the West.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0487116/

Sounds very interesting.
5 posted on 03/27/2006 6:20:28 PM PST by Chgogal (The US Military fights for Freedom of the Press while the NYT lies about the Military and cowers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone; SJackson; yonif; Simcha7; American in Israel; Slings and Arrows; judicial meanz; ...
'Pipes' Ping!

Professor Daniel Pipes, the sharp rock in the Islamist's sandal.





AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

American Flag

6 posted on 03/27/2006 6:49:04 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

And to think this hit piece by the MB sounds like a blazing tribute to Pipes to their opposition.


7 posted on 03/27/2006 7:09:18 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1
AMERICA's war on terrorism did not begin in September 2001. It began in November 1979.

That was shortly after Ayatollah Khomeini had seized power in Iran, riding the slogan "Death to America" - and sure enough, the attacks on Americans soon began. In November 1979, a militant Islamic mob took over the U.S. embassy in Tehran, the Iranian capital, and held 52 Americans hostage for the next 444 days.

The rescue team sent to free those hostages in April 1980 suffered eight fatalities, making them the first of militant Islam's many American casualties. Others included:

April 1983: 17 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut.

October 1983: 241 dead at the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.

December 1983: five dead at the U.S. embassy in Kuwait.

January 1984: the president of the American University of Beirut killed.

April 1984: 18 dead near a U.S. airbase in Spain.

September 1984: 16 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut (again).

December 1984: Two dead on a plane hijacked to Tehran.

June 1985: One dead on a plane hijacked to Beirut.

After a let-up, the attacks then restarted: Five and 19 dead in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996, 224 dead at the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 and 17 dead on the USS Cole in Yemen in October 2000.

Simultaneously, the murderous assault of militant Islam also took place on U.S. soil:

July 1980: an Iranian dissident killed in the Washington, D.C. area.

August 1983: a leader of the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam killed in Canton, Mich.

August 1984: three Indians killed in a suburb of Tacoma, Wash.

September 1986: a doctor killed in Augusta, Ga.

January 1990: an Egyptian freethinker killed in Tucson, Ariz.

November 1990: a Jewish leader killed in New York.

February 1991: an Egyptian Islamist killed in New York.

January 1993: two CIA staff killed outside agency headquarters in Langley, Va.

February 1993: Six people killed at the World Trade Center.

March 1994: an Orthodox Jewish boy killed on the Brooklyn Bridge.

February 1997: a Danish tourist killed on the Empire State building.

October 1999: 217 passengers killed on an EgyptAir flight near New York City.

In all, 800 persons lost their lives in the course of attacks by militant Islam on Americans before September 2001 - more than killed by any other enemy since the Vietnam War. (Further, this listing does not include the dozens more Americans in Israel killed by militant Islamic terrorists.)

And yet, these murders hardly registered. Only with the events of a year ago did Americans finally realize that "Death to America" truly is the battle cry of this era's most dangerous foe, militant Islam.

In retrospect, the mistake began when Iranians assaulted the U.S. embassy in Tehran and met with no resistance.

Interestingly, a Marine sergeant present at the embassy that fateful day in November 1979 agrees with this assessment. As the militant Islamic mob invaded the embassy, Rodney V. Sickmann followed orders and protected neither himself nor the embassy. As a result, he was taken hostage and lived to tell the tale. (He now works for Anheuser-Busch.)

In retrospect, he believes that passivity was a mistake. The Marines should have done their assigned duty, even if it cost their lives. "Had we opened fire on them, maybe we would only have lasted an hour." But had they done that, they "could have changed history."

Standing their ground would have sent a powerful signal that the United States of America cannot be attacked with impunity. In contrast, the embassy's surrender sent the opposite signal - that it's open season on Americans. "If you look back, it started in 1979; it's just escalated," Sickmann correctly concludes.

To which one of the century's great geostrategist thinkers, Robert Strausz-Hupé, adds his assent. Just before passing away earlier this year at the age of 98, Strausz-Hupé wrote his final words, and they were about the war on terrorism: "I have lived long enough to see good repeatedly win over evil, although at a much higher cost than need have been paid. This time we have already paid the price of victory. It remains for us to win it."

Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and author of "Militant Islam Reaches America."


8 posted on 03/27/2006 7:11:18 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Salem

In the name of Allah, the merciful, the compassionate.

To whom it may concern:

I am writing this letter to inform you of my reasons for premeditating and attempting to murder citizens and residents of the United States of America on Friday, March 3, 2006 in the city of Chapel Hill, North Carolina by running them over with my automobile and stabbing them with a knife if the opportunities are presented to me by Allah.

I did intend to use a handgun to murder the citizens and residents of Chapel Hill, North Carolina but the process of receiving a permit for a handgun in this city is highly restricted and out of my reach at the present, most likely due to my foreign nationality.

I am a servant of Allah. I am 22 years of age and I was born in Tehran, Iran. My father, mother and older sister immigrated to the United States in 1985 when I was two years of age and I’ve lived in the United States ever since.

I attended elementary, middle and high school in North Carolina and I was accepted into the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. I began my college career in August 2001 and graduated in December 2005 with a bachelor’s degree in psychology and philosophy with Allah’s help.

I do not wish to pursue my career as a student any further because I have no desire to amass the impermanent and temporary fame and material wealth this world has to offer. However I made the decision to continue my studies and to graduate from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill so that the world will know that Allah’s servants are very intelligent.

Due to the killing of believing men and women under the direction of the United States government, I have decided to take advantage of my presence on United States soil on Friday, March 3, 2006 to take the lives of as many Americans and American sympathizers as I can in order to punish the United States for their immoral actions around the world.

In the Qur’an, Allah states that the believing men and women have permission to murder anyone responsible for the killing of other believing men and women. I know that the Qur’an is a legitimate and authoritative holy scripture since it is completely validated by modern science and also mathematically encoded with the number 19 beyond human ability. After extensive contemplation and reflection, I have made the decision to exercise the right of violent retaliation that Allah has given me to the fullest extent to which I am capable at present.

I have chosen the particular location on the University campus as my target since I know there is a high likelihood that I will kill several people before being killed myself or jailed and sent to prison if Allah wills. Allah’s commandments are never to be questioned and all of Allah’s commandments must be obeyed. Those who violate Allah’s commandments and purposefully follow human fabrication and falsehood as their religion will burn in fire for eternity in accordance with Allah’s will.

Sincerely yours,
Mohammed Reza Taheri-Azar


9 posted on 03/27/2006 7:12:54 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
" In retrospect, he believes that passivity was a mistake. The Marines should have done their assigned duty, even if it cost their lives. "Had we opened fire on them, maybe we would only have lasted an hour." But had they done that, they "could have changed history." Standing their ground would have sent a powerful signal that the United States of America cannot be attacked with impunity. In contrast, the embassy's surrender sent the opposite signal - that it's open season on Americans. "If you look back, it started in 1979; it's just escalated," Sickmann correctly concludes."

Thank you, Jimmy Carter. /s

10 posted on 03/27/2006 7:16:59 PM PST by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Liars lying.


11 posted on 03/27/2006 7:46:54 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

I remain convinced that he was and will be the worst foreign policy President of my lifetime.


12 posted on 03/27/2006 8:04:44 PM PST by FreedomPoster (Guns themselves are fairly robust; their chief enemies are rust and politicians) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

Fine upstanding assimiliated American citizen, that guy.


13 posted on 03/27/2006 8:19:35 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

And you would be right.


14 posted on 03/27/2006 8:20:16 PM PST by Salem (FREE REPUBLIC - Fighting to win within the Arena of the War of Ideas! So get in the fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salem
Mooselimbs are really, really, really, dumb


15 posted on 03/27/2006 8:22:35 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sageb1

The hatred of your enemies is high praise indeed.
Mr.Pipes comes highly recommended.


16 posted on 03/27/2006 8:58:57 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

I know that the Qur’an is a legitimate and authoritative holy scripture since it is completely validated by modern science and also mathematically encoded with the number 19 beyond human ability.

19 ?

Whoa, the Mohammed Code, wonder when the movie will come out?

We continue to try to reason with the insane, it's not possible.


17 posted on 03/27/2006 9:04:08 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

ping


18 posted on 03/27/2006 9:34:06 PM PST by Do not dub me shapka broham ("The moment that someone wants to forbid caricatures, that is the moment we publish them.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Pipes has been a beacon of clear thought on the Muslim insanity for many years. You do us all a favor by posting this diatribe about him by a person who reveals his agenda so patently.

Your own contributions to clear thought are earning you a place of high esteem in these rooms. We are priveledged by your presence.


19 posted on 03/27/2006 9:57:00 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

ADD: The website this "scathing piece is posted on is the Muslim equivalent of the Dems Underground for "talking points". I have gladly bookmarked it.

Iknanweb.com

PS: What do you suppose the author means by the term "mediatic"? Is it some form of muslim version of "idiotic"?


20 posted on 03/27/2006 10:04:35 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: All
ON THE NET...

Google Search Term: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD"

DiscoverTheNetworks.org: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD"

FreeRepublic.com - Key Word: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD"

JAMESTOWN.org - Terrorism Monitor: "AL-QAEDA & THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD: UNITED BY STRATEGY, DIVIDED BY TACTICS" by Lydia Khalil (March 23, 2006)

FRONTPAGE MAGAZINE.com: "BAN THE BROTHERHOOD" by Dr. Rachel Ehrenfeld, Alyssa A. Lappen and Terri Wonder (December 27, 2005)

"littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=18580_Whitewashing_the_Muslim_Brotherhood&only"

MEMRI.org - Special Dispatch Series - No. 1045: "Leading Islamist Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi: 'We Will Be Victorious, Allah Willing - Despite the Traps Set by Judaism & Crusaders'" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "The following are excerpts from Sheikh Yousef Al-Qaradhawi's Friday December 2, 2005, which aired the same date on Qatar TV. Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi is head of the European Council for Fatwa and Research, president of the International Association of Muslim Scholars (IAMS), and the spiritual guide of many other Islamist organizations across the world (including the Muslim Brotherhood). In this sermon, he discusses the Jews at the time of Muhammad, as well as the situation in Iraq, calling for Iraq to be protected from the "American Satan." For more on Sheikh Al-Qaradhawi, see accompanying list. TO VIEW CLIP VISIT http://www.memritv.org/search.asp?ACT=S9&P1=949 ") (December 9, 2005)
"littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=18262_Muslim_Brotherhood_Rising&only" (October 16, 2005)

JIHAD WATCH.org (Reuters): Cairo - "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD BUILDS EGYPTIAN PARLIAMENTARY BLOC" (November 27, 2005)

THE COUNTERTERRORISM BLOG: "THE PROJECT OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TO CONQUER THE WORLD" -Posted by Olivier Guitta (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "According to Sylvain Besson, a Swiss investigative reporter, Swiss authorities found a fascinating document when they entered Yusuf Nada’s villa in November 2001. Nada is by the way viewed as one of the bankrollers of Al Qaeda; he is the head of the Al Taqwa Bank. The document seized entitled “The Project” is a fourteen page leaflet dated December 1982 calling for the Muslim Brotherhood’s conquest of the world. It is a detailed roadmap to attain this objective.") (October 30, 2005)
FreeRepublic.com (http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3159944,00.html): "ARAB EMIRATES: HAMAS FOUNDER DIES" (SNIPPET: "Halil Quka, one of the founders of Hamas, died at the age of 58 in the United Arab Emirates. In the 1980s Quka was considered one of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders in Gaza, second only to Sheikh Ahmed Yassin. He was banished from Gaza in the mid-1980s.") (October 26, 2005)
JIHAD WATCH.org (IQNA): "A CRIME AGAINST ISLAM" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "The head of the Muslim Brotherhood in Kuwait has warned Arab leaders that the normalization of relations with Israel constitutes a “crime against Islam.” Speaking at a diplomatic reception for Arab and Muslim envoys on Saturday, 'Abdallah Al-Mutawwa', the leader of Social Islam Society, said, “Palestinians are killed, their houses demolished and land confiscated while we are rushing for normalization with the Zionist regime” Al-Mutawwa’s comments were sparked by word that Bahrain has ended its boycott of Israeli goods and Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf’s recent overtures towards the Jewish state." (October 12, 2005)
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST.com: "THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN FRANCE" -Column by Glen Feder (September 2005)

INTERNET-HAGANAH.US: "AL-MULTAQA.NET: Forum of the Muslim Brotherhood" (August 9, 2005)

MEMRI.org - Special Dispatch Series No. 949: "SYRIAN EXPATRIATE ASKS: WHO ARE THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD TRYING TO FOOL?" (August 3, 2005)

DanielPipes.org - Weblog: "THE MUSLIM AMERICAN SOCIETY'S GOALS" (May 25, 2005)

INTERNET-HAGANAH.US: "LOOKING FOR SHEIKH AL-QARADHAWI?" (May 18, 2005)

"www.internet-haganah.us/hmedia/18may05-al-qaradhawi.jpg"

FRONT PAGE MAGAZINE.com: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD - OF TERRORISTS" by Steven Stalinsky (May 10, 2005)

JIHAD WATCH.org: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD - OF TERRORISTS" (May 10, 2005)

TOWNHALL.com: "WAKE UP WASHINGTON!" - Column by Caroline B. Glick (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "Hamas and al-Qaida share more than financial networks. They share the same ideological roots. Hamas is the Palestinian branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.") (May 7, 2005)
INTERNET-HAGANAH.US (ITAR-TASS-Russia): "RUSSIANS SAY JORDANIAN MERCENARY PLANNED ATTACKS USING POISON" (ARTICLE SNIPPET: "An emissary of the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaeda international terrorist networks, he arrived in Chechnya from Jordan in 1992 and controlled several Wahhabi groups in Ingushetia. Law enforcement bodies learned that the attacks using toxic substances were to have been carried out by a Wahhabi group led by Alash Daudov, 45, who obtained the substances through Abu Mujahid.") (May 6, 2005)
JIHAD WATCH.org (CBS-11): "DALLAS: GOVERNMENT TO DEPORT AREA SYRIAN FOR 'MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD' TIES U.S. Government to Deport Area Syrian for 'Muslim Brotherhood' Ties, Iraq Guerrilla Warfare Training" (May 5, 2005)

JIHAD WATCH.org (AP): "HUGE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD DEMONSTRATION IN EGYPT" (May 5, 2005)

"http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=15698_Muslim_Brotherhood_Condemns_Cairo_Attacks&only=yes" (May 1, 2005)

MEMRI.org - Special Dispatch Series - No. 843: "KUWAITI INTELLECTUAL: THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ORGANIZATION SHOULD BE PUT ON THE U.S. TERRORIST LIST" (January 7, 2005)
INTERNET-HAGANAH.US (e-prism.org - Director and Editor: Reuven Paz): "QARADHAWI AND THE WORLD ASSOCIATION OF MUSLIM CLERICS: THE NEW PLATFORM OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD" (November 27, 2004) (Read More...)

JIHAD WATCH.org (CHICAGO TRIBUNE): "A RARE LOOK AT SECRETIVE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD IN AMERICA" (September 19, 2004)

MEMRI.org - MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE Special Dispatch Series - No. 776: "THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD MOVEMENT IN SUPPORT OF FIGHTING AMERICANS FORCES IN IRAQ" (September 3, 2004)

MEMRI.org - MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE Inquiry and Analysis Series No. 186: "MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ACTIVISTS' POSSIBLE RETURN TO SYRIA" (August 25, 2004)

MEMRI.org - MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE: "SYRIA/LEBANON"

MEMRI.org - MIDDLE EAST MEDIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE Special Dispatch Series - No. 655: "NEW MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD LEADER: RESISTANCE IN IRAQ AND PALESTINE IS LEGITIMATE; AMERICA IS SATAN; ISLAM WILL INVADE AMERICA AND EUROPE" (February 4, 2004)

21 posted on 03/28/2006 12:09:00 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnathanRGalt; backhoe; piasa; Godzilla

ping


22 posted on 03/28/2006 12:09:53 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000
AMERICA's war on terrorism did not begin in September 2001. It began in November 1979.

Respectfully, America's war on terrorism began on June 5, 1968.
23 posted on 03/28/2006 5:19:37 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tet68
19?

What an idiot. Everybody knows the answer is 42.
24 posted on 03/28/2006 5:26:06 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone
Daniel Pipes, the expert of hate

Pipes is a pussycat.
25 posted on 03/28/2006 5:28:13 AM PST by UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide (Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cornpone

Correction:

Here is the correct web address for the Muslim "Talking Points":

http://www.ikhwanweb.com/Home.asp?zPage=Systems&System=PressR&Lang=E


26 posted on 03/28/2006 6:24:28 AM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson