Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Possible legal battle looming over tobacco settlement
journalnow.com ^ | March 28, 2006

Posted on 03/28/2006 6:43:55 PM PST by SheLion

WASHINGTON
A legal battle may be looming between states, including North Carolina, and tobacco companies over money owed from a landmark 1998 settlement agreement. What's at stake could be more than $1 billion.

An economic consulting firm determined late Monday that the agreement between the cigarette companies and the states was a "significant factor" in contributing to a loss of market share for the companies that signed on to the settlement.

The report stated that the agreement, which imposed numerous marketing limits on the companies and required billions of dollars in payments to states, led to the erosion of their market share to smaller manufacturers that didn't sign on and generally sell discount cigarettes.

That finding is one of several determinations that would be necessary for the tobacco companies to reduce their annual payments to states under the agreement.

The No. 1 cigarette maker, Philip Morris, declined Tuesday to comment on whether it will seek to have its payments reduced.

But Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller and Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden released a joint statement Tuesday saying the finding by the Brattle Group, a consulting firm tasked by both sides with looking into the issue of eroding market share, should not lead to a reduction in payments. The two head the tobacco committee for the National Association of Attorneys General.

Miller and Wasden said the reduction - an estimated $1.2 billion - could only occur if states have failed to enforce statutes that require cigarette makers that aren't part of the settlement to put money in escrow accounts to meet any future legal obligations.

The attorneys general say states are enforcing those statutes.

"As a result, the settling states believe that it would not be appropriate to withhold any portion of the April 17 payment," the statement said. About $6.5 billion is due to the states on that date.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: anti; antismokers; augusta; bans; budget; butts; camel; caribou; chicago; cigar; cigarettes; cigarettetax; commerce; epa; fda; governor; individual; interstate; kool; lawmakers; lewiston; liberty; maine; mainesmokers; marlboro; msa; niconazis; osha; pallmall; pipe; portland; prosmoker; quitsmoking; regulation; rico; rights; rinos; ryo; sales; senate; smokers; smoking; smokingbans; taxes; tobacco; winston
ah-hem!
1 posted on 03/28/2006 6:44:00 PM PST by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Foolkiller; Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; Cantiloper; metesky; Judith Anne; lockjaw02; ...

2 posted on 03/28/2006 6:44:36 PM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

It will be interesting to see the out-come of this.....


3 posted on 03/28/2006 7:02:10 PM PST by 383rr (Those who choose security over liberty deserve neither- GUN CONTROL=SLAVERY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

The smae ambulance chasers that sued the tobacco companies will now sue the states. Can't we ship these weasels to France.


4 posted on 03/28/2006 7:13:53 PM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant
Can't we ship these weasels to France.

I WISH!!!

5 posted on 03/28/2006 7:19:22 PM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

If this had REALLY been about "secondhand smoke" and the "health hazards" of smoking, tobacco would have been banned a long time ago. Unfortunately, this was all about MONEY. Only MONEY. MONEY for greedy lawyers and disgraceful politicians. Nothing more. Shame on you America for allowing this legalized extortion to occur.


6 posted on 03/28/2006 7:21:52 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Sacrificing unity and national identity for "diversity" and "multiculturalism" is a really dumb idea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
Unfortunately, this was all about MONEY. Only MONEY. MONEY for greedy lawyers and disgraceful politicians/

You got THAT right!!!

 

7 posted on 03/28/2006 7:36:48 PM PST by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer
If this had REALLY been about "secondhand smoke" and the "health hazards" of smoking, tobacco would have been banned a long time ago. Unfortunately, this was all about MONEY. Only MONEY. MONEY for greedy lawyers and disgraceful politicians. Nothing more. Shame on you America for allowing this legalized extortion to occur.

Maybe it has come to the point where the companys are losing on cigs anyhow. Maybe a spite would be to give them away free and stick it to them all. Most companies have diversified anyway and tobacco is not a major part of their bottom line...

8 posted on 03/28/2006 8:29:14 PM PST by glowworm ( Liberal thot is truly a mental condition...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson