Posted on 03/30/2006 3:10:53 PM PST by NormsRevenge
I see you spinning on that other thread.
You have zero loyalty for any candidate.
You support whoever will lose, thus helping the Democrats.
Howard is toast...who's next?
But not with Buchanan. Correct.
says you.. lol
you must have missed my disclaimer I posted later to specifically address folks like you.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1606887/posts?page=27#27
Your disclaimer is obvious. See post 81.
I've noticed that you never use a first name when discussing "Buchannan". Is there a reason for this?
I don't use George, either. I do use Arnold because his last name is a nightmare.
Gotcha. Getting back to the Specter thing, do you think Specter is less of a destructive force in this country than Pat Buchannan?
Specter is relevant and has won an election. Pat Buchannan is not and has not.
Less destructive? To whom?
To Americans in general. I suppose we'll disagree on this. It's a pretty gay argument anyway. I mean George Bush, Sr is currently fundraising with Bill Clinton. Guilt by association is not a great debating tactic.
That's a nice meaningless throw-away line. How do you define successful and not successful for a member of the Legislature? If Howard wasn't successful, tell me who was, and what made them successful in your book.
I worked with Howard while he was there as Assembly Republican support staff. Howard was always one of the die hard conservative warriors, and always at the forefront of the prolife movement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.