Posted on 03/30/2006 3:46:27 PM PST by rhema
San Francisco, CA -- Teenagers in the United States are having abortions in fewer numbers than at any time since Roe v. Wade and are more pro-life than older Americans. That means fewer customers for Planned Parenthood, but the abortion business has come up with a corporate marketing plan to lure teens with free iPods and movie tickets. Planned Parenthood Golden Gate, the center that gave teenager Holly Patterson the dangerous abortion drug that killed her, is leading the way with the new marketing scheme.
Anyone who makes an appointment at one of the eight PPGG centers before April 30, 2006, can enter to win an iPod.
A poster announcing another Planned Parenthood program, called Tell-A-Friend, includes a photograph of a teenage girl whispering into the ear of another teen and telling. The text of the ad reads: "Get free movie tickets? Yes. When you tell a friend about Planned Parenthood."
"These are some of the schemes Planned Parenthood is using to lure teenagers into its deadly facilities, said Douglas Scott, president of Life Decisions International, a group that organizes boycotts of companies that contribute to the abortion business.
Now which age group is most likely to be swayed by this kind of gimmick? Scott asked. This incentive is clearly aimed at young people.
Planned Parenthood has resorted to common corporate tactics in an effort to get young people to encourage their peers to voluntarily become the pro-abortion group's new victims," he said.
In the tell a friend campaign, teens are asked to obtain a special card at a Planned Parenthood center or download one from their web site. The promoter gets two free movie passes redeemable at any United Artist theater and the friend receives $10 off her first visit.
Other Planned Parenthood abortion businesses other than PPGG are using the campaign as well, including the Planned Parenthood ffiliate network in Colorado.
Scott said the cards are also offensive because they include graphics from a cartoon video PPGG produced calling for violence against pro-life advocates. A superhero in the cartoon asks abortion advocates to participate in the "elimination" of pro-life people and shoots them with a ray gun.
"Just like any other business, a key target group for Planned Parenthood is young people, Scott said. "And once a teenager is hooked, he or she can prove to be a good source of income for many years to come.
LDI is currently investigating to determine if United Artists donated the tickets to Planned Parenthood or if they were purchased by the group. The pro-life group has not yet called for a boycott of the movie theater company.
Related web sites:
Life Decisions International
Of course it is, once you say "can't" there is a big stumbling block. Logically, you have placed a limitation on His power.
False. To ask whether that which is logically impossible to do could be done is simply to to talk nonsense ... and nonsense doesn't become sense because you talk it about God. (Luckily, God forgives those who are genuinely incapable of understanding this point.)
"So it is okay to kill them and let them get a free pass to heaven?"
First off - you would go to hell, second, aren't we all BORN into sin ( original sin ), so we have a need to be "saved" ?
Unless we've redefind just what "born" means these days also ...
"To ask whether that which is logically impossible to do could be done is simply to to talk nonsense ... "
Absurd - To define a being of limitless power, then to assign a limit known as "logic" is foolishness.
Is man so arrogant that when he defines something as a logical impossibility, then it simply MUST be so ?
The opposite is true; talking of a being that can do the logically impossible is foolishness.
"The opposite is true; talking of a being that can do the logically impossible is foolishness."
LOL - a simple denial while avoiding my second point -
Just why is you think that not only you can decide that your concept of "logical impossibility" would be a limitation to an all-powerfull God, but that what you consider a " logical impossibility " in a human sense would apply at all ?
Because sensible adults understand that "all-powerful" does not, because it cannot, include the power to do that which is logically impossible.
but that what you consider a " logical impossibility " in a human sense would apply at all ?
I expect that some of the things we perceive as logical impossibilities really aren't ... but I strongly doubt that ALL of them aren't.
You have simply made a definition that fits your own belief
No, I've stated a definition that fits basic rationality.
I expect that some of the things we perceive as logical impossibilities really aren't ... but I strongly doubt that ALL of them aren't.
Again, you have simply restated a belief that you are correct ... mostly.
LOL! Yes, because logic is my own personal invention.
"No, I've stated a definition that fits basic rationality."
Interesting ... So the concept of an all-powerfull God creating everything from nothing fits your definition of basic rationality ?
Absolutely ... it's as rational an explanation for the Big Bang as any other that's been proposed.
"Absolutely ... it's as rational an explanation for the Big Bang as any other that's been proposed."
Your logic fails you - rationality is not based on a comparison with other explanations that may or may not be rational themselves.
Would you also claim that it was rational because it is "as rational as" this African Creation story ? -
Boshongo
(Bantu tribe of Central Africa) In the beginning there was only darkness, water, and the great god Bumba. One day Bumba, in pain from a stomachache, vomited up the sun. The sun dried up some of the water, leaving land. Still in pain, Bumba vomited up the moon, the stars, and then some animals: the leopard, the crocodile, the turtle, and, finally, some men, one of whom, Yoko Lima was white like Bumba.
True ... but we know the Big Bang happened, so it's not unreasonable for me to prefer an explanation that's no less rational than any other.
Adjustment;
Why the hell is our Republican-controlled federal government WE THE PEOPLE still funding this monstrous organization?
"... but we know the Big Bang happened"
so the most rational explanation for a Big Bang is an all powerfull being ?
so the most rational explanation for a Big Bang is an all powerfull being ?
Putting words in my mouth, and deleting the words that directly contradict your fabrications, I see. Run along, now, sonny.
Excuse me ?
You make a statement "but we know the Big Bang happened "
and use that statement, which I have to assume you believe is true, in an attempt to explain your earlier rationalizations.
Are you telling me now that you DON'T believe that statement is correct ?
And went on to say more, which you deleted before putting different words in my mouth.
and use that statement, which I have to assume you believe is true, in an attempt to explain your earlier rationalizations.
My ENTIRE statement was in explanation of my previous posts.
Are you telling me now that you DON'T believe that statement is correct ?
I believe everything I post.
I put NO words in your mouth - I asked a question that was a rational, logical ( I know how much you love those words ) extension of your statements.
You seem to have brought the "Big Bang" subject into this conversation without clearly explaning just why.
My question - " so the most rational explanation for a Big Bang is an all powerfull being ? " was an attempt to figure out just what it is you are talking about and how it applies.
Yes you did ... you deleted my words "it's not unreasonable for me to prefer an explanation that's no less rational than any other" and said "so the most rational explanation for a Big Bang is an all powerfull being ?" (emphasis added)
You seem to have brought the "Big Bang" subject into this conversation without clearly explaning just why.
YOU raised the subject of "an all-powerfull God creating everything from nothing;" are you ignorant of the fact that the Big Bang was the beginning of everything?
Yes you did ... you deleted my words "it's not unreasonable for me to prefer an explanation that's no less rational than any other" and said "so the most rational explanation for a Big Bang is an all powerfull being ?" (emphasis added)
Thanks for illustrating my point... deleting your words is NOT putting different ones in your mouth, and my question was MY question.
"are you ignorant of the fact that the Big Bang was the beginning of everything?"
The Big Bang has graduated from theory to fact ?
There's a theory that God created everything 5 minutes ago, and no way to prove it's not valid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.