[PeaRidge]

"Then the obvious question is what does one have to do with the other?"

I did not make that connection. Trying to insinuate another fallacy?

"On the contrary, the confederate constitution did not allow the confederate congress to pass any legislation impairing the ownership of slaves."

Nice try at another non-sequitur bait, but not worth comentary.

[Non-Sequitur]

Nice try at another non-sequitur bait, but not worth comentary.

Because you won't refute it? Or because you can't?