Not crying. And nowhere near your shoulder.
My impression is that a lot of people want a lock step hard core far right party. I want legitimate debate and multiple points of view. I also want to maintain the majority. There is something to be said for supporting the most conservative candidate with an opportunity to win. It's a layered decision making process, especially in CA.
It's a tough question - do we support the candidate we most agree with even if they cannot win? I'm NOT saying your guy can't win, but that is the question conservatives continually face.
When you concede a 'legitimately divided party' then you are adding to the problem, not solving it. Read a few NYT articles about the state of the (R) party - and you may find that they agree with your assessment, and are hoping it's true.
End of conversation.
My impression is that a lot of people want a lock step hard core far right party...
---
You say that likes its something evil,, imo.
Like what we have is working so well at present. moderates out the ying yang, appeaisng everyione, and pleasing no one at the same time.
Ideas win, hyperbole and hoopla do little to serve the people.
You want debate, when 11(?) candidates are running in the GOP primary, there is no way it can happen. party officials , as inept as they are sometimes in this state should have limited the number so we could have seen a real debate, not a quick dog and pony show.
end of convo.. says who? You? my my, that smacks of something. if you ask me.