To: CarolinaGuitarman
This sentence, while seemingly impervious to English translation, seems to be repeating the same old canard about evolution being *just a theory* and therefore not like all the rest of science, which is *verified*.
The part that jumped out at me was the 'that occurred previous to written history' part. Sounds like it covers astronomy, cosmology, geology, archeology, anthropology, etc. as well as biology.
26 posted on
04/02/2006 12:04:11 PM PDT by
ml1954
(NOT the disruptive troll seen frequently on CREVO threads.)
To: ml1954
The part that jumped out at me was the 'that occurred previous to written history' part. Sounds like it covers astronomy, cosmology, geology, archeology, anthropology, etc. as well as biology. Well, that's all evolution. If it contradicts Genesis in any way it simply must be evolution.
27 posted on
04/02/2006 12:14:20 PM PDT by
BMCDA
(If the human brain were so simple that we could understand it,we would be so simple that we couldn't)
To: ml1954
The part that jumped out at me was the 'that occurred previous to written history' part. Sounds like it covers astronomy, cosmology, geology, archeology, anthropology, etc. as well as biology. It also rules out Genesis. No human observer was there for the six days of creation. Even Adam, who arrived on day six, didn't witness his own appearance, and he was asleep when Eve was created. So where does that leave us?
28 posted on
04/02/2006 12:22:06 PM PDT by
PatrickHenry
(Yo momma's so fat she's got a Schwarzschild radius.)
To: ml1954
Yes, it covers everything previous to Sumeria.
Lovely.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson