I managed to plow through THE THIRD TERRORIST, and while it is an INCREDIBLY badly written book, it does make a compelling case for a Middle Eastern connection. If there is truth in even a tenth of what the author says, it warrants a new investigation.
Another good read is "The Secret Life of Bill Clinton", by Ambrose Evans Pritchard. There is an entire section about the OKC bombing, Srassmeir connection, etc. And this was written in the '90's.
The author (British jounalist) di a personal investigation.
Plow through? Incredibly badly written?
LMAO!
Many of my friends have read the book and I have learned something interesting in the way people read the book. If someone reads it and tries to remember the facts in the book, they come away extremely frustrated because there is so much to absorb. The book is so full of documentation. But if you read the book as a story and try to get an overview, you come away with a totally different attitude, a lot less frustration. So that is what I tell people when they read it. Don't try to remember the details. Just get the big picture.
One of Jayna's biggest fans among my friends read it the overview way. (And that is when he became her biggest fan). He was livid when he read it! He was passionate about believing what he read and making sure everyone he talked to knew about the book.
On the other hand, his wife read it and tried to absorb all the detail and came away extremely frustrated that she couldn't remember all the detail. This is when I started comparing reading styles with my friends. So, for anyone who has not yet read the book but plans on it, let this be a recommendation for "how" to read the book.