I'll just get this out so that the GWB loyalists don't have to:
- Without GWB we would be in danger of terrorism (partially true - but not the basis of the criticism in this article...no one has said that he is failing as commander in chief; even FDR can win a war)
- The Democrats would be worse on spending (arguably false, as if the D's were in charge, the GOP would become an effective opposition party)
- if you oppose GWB, you are a RINO using DU and DNC talking points (whatever...that's one of the points of the article ie that the vilification of those who dare question the king is poor procedure and in this White House has led to profoundly liberal policies)
Now...if the Bush loyalists have better arguments than those to SUBSTANTIVELY deal with this article and not just bitch and moan at the author and those who agree with them, then there are a lot of us here who are all ears.
(While we're at it, I wonder if the accounting guru's who have us the numbers for the prescription drugs benefit factored in all of the amnesty for illegals who will now officially become part of the Republican welfare state? Anyone think of that? Anyone?)
We hear the "conservatives" (actually wolves in sheeps' clothing) who have NEVER liked ANYTHING the President has done attacking mindlessly again. Who cares? The vast majority of these are real Leftists, disgruntled third party fans, or simply terribly confused and easily lead into error and destruction.
As President Bush cannot shape his policies to please those who know little about the real world. The Perpetually Pissed Off around here is joined hand in glove with the Leftists who love to hate the President.
Nice post at # 11.
You forgot my favorite GWB loyalist line:
"Hey, Reagan sucked, too!"