Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It looks like the SC is NOT going to shoot down the Administrations pursuit of justice against terrorists.

Note Ginsburg, Breyer and Souter against the administration. GHW Bush was sleepwalking when he appointed Souter.

1 posted on 04/03/2006 11:45:01 AM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: truth_seeker

6-3 is "a divided court". Nice work, AP.


2 posted on 04/03/2006 11:47:28 AM PDT by AmishDude (AmishDude, servant of the dark lord Xenu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
Padilla was moved in January to Miami to face criminal charges, and the government argued that the appeal over his indefinite detention was now pointless.

The administration only finally brought him to justice in order to avoid a ruling on the constitutionality of their actions. What were they afraid of?

3 posted on 04/03/2006 11:47:56 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

GHWB was, unfortunately, sleepwalking throughout the entirety of his administration - at least domestically - its what got him defeated....


5 posted on 04/03/2006 11:49:02 AM PDT by Al Simmons (Four-time Bush Voter 1994-2004!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
Padilla's case was different. It asked the court to clarify how far the government can go when its hunt for terrorists leads to Americans in this country.

I remember an interview with Padilla (why don't we use his Muslim name?) and he said Jose was caught "on the streets of O'Hare airport".

He was arrested at a port having returned from an international destination. Good enough for me.

6 posted on 04/03/2006 11:49:50 AM PDT by AmishDude (AmishDude, servant of the dark lord Xenu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

THere was no surprise that Ginsdilla, Breyerdilla and Soupad wanted their brother terrorist/terrorist sympathizer given appeal rights of some sort.


7 posted on 04/03/2006 11:49:51 AM PDT by muawiyah (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
Note Ginsburg, Breyer and Souter against the administration. GHW Bush was sleepwalking when he appointed Souter.

The question wasn't whether the detention was legal, but whether the court should address the issue of its legality. The government finally putting him on trial removed the legal need for this case, but those three justices wanted the issue decided now rather than wait for the next case.

I disagree with those three. The government's move was brilliant, as it changed the constitutionality into an academic exercise, and courts are supposed to decide cases, not academic exercises.

13 posted on 04/03/2006 12:05:25 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker
And three other court members, including Chief Justice John Roberts, said that they would be watching to ensure Padilla receives the protections "guaranteed to all federal criminal defendants."

Padilla should be treated as an enemy combatent. Did conservatives get screwed again on the appointment of Roberts??

34 posted on 04/03/2006 1:25:50 PM PDT by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: truth_seeker

Is there some way to get Ginsberg to resign or pass on before Bush becomes an utter lame duck?


35 posted on 04/03/2006 2:10:36 PM PDT by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson