Skip to comments.MEXICO'S GLASS HOUSE- How the Mexican constitution treats foreigners
Posted on 04/03/2006 8:06:35 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
How the Mexican constitution treats foreign residents, workers and naturalized citizens
Every country has the right to restrict the quality and quantity of foreign immigrants entering or living within its borders. If American policymakers are looking for legal models on which to base new laws restricting immigration and expelling foreign lawbreakers, they have a handy guide: the Mexican constitution.
Adopted in 1917, the constitution of the United Mexican States borrows heavily from American constitutional and legal principles. It combines those principles with a strong sense nationalism, cultural self-identity, paternalism, and state power. Mexico's constitution contains many provisions to protect the country from foreigners, including foreigners legally resident in the country and even foreign-born people who have become naturalized Mexican citizens. The Mexican constitution segregates immigrants and naturalized citizens from native-born citizens by denying immigrants basic human rights that Mexican immigrants enjoy in the United States.
By making increasing demands that the U.S. not enforce its immigration laws and, indeed, that it liberalize them, Mexico is throwing stones within its own glass house. This paper, the first of a short series on Mexican immigration double standards, examines the Mexican constitution's protections against immigrants, and concludes with some questions about U.S. policy.
In brief, the Mexican Constitution states that:
- Immigrants and foreign visitors are banned from public political discourse.
- Immigrants and foreigners are denied certain basic property rights.
- Immigrants are denied equal employment rights.
- Immigrants and naturalized citizens will never be treated as real Mexican citizens.
- Immigrants and naturalized citizens are not to be trusted in public service.
- Immigrants and naturalized citizens may never become members of the clergy.
- Private citizens may make citizens arrests of lawbreakers (i.e., illegal immigrants) and hand them to the authorities.
- Immigrants may be expelled from Mexico for any reason and without due process.
The Mexican constitution: Unfriendly to immigrants
The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country's political life. Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, "only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country." Article 33 is unambiguous: "Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country."
The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners. If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast. Article 27 states,
"Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereunto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country." (Emphasis added)
The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal ones, in the public sector. Article 32: "Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces."
The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized. Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports:
"In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic."
An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.
Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).
The president of Mexico, like the president of the United States, constitutionally must be a citizen by birth, but Article 82 of the Mexican constitution mandates that the president's parents also be
Mexican-born citizens, thus according secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.
The Mexican constitution forbids immigrants and naturalized citizens to become members of the clergy. Article 130 says, "To practice the ministry of any denomination in the United Mexican States it is necessary to be a Mexican by birth."
The Mexican constitution singles out "undesirable aliens." Article 11 guarantees federal protection against "undesirable aliens resident in the country."
The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen's arrests. Article 16 states, "in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities." Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.
The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process. According to Article 33, "the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action."
Notional policy options
Mexico and the United States have much to learn from one another's laws and practices on immigration and naturalization. A study of the immigration and citizenship portions of the Mexican constitution leads to a search for new policy options to find a fair and equitable solution to the immigration problem in the United States.
Two contrary options would require reciprocity, while doing the utmost to harmonize U.S.-Mexican relations:
1. Mexico should amend its constitution to guarantee immigrants to Mexico the same rights it demands the United States give to immigrants from Mexico; or
2. The United States should impose the same restrictions on Mexican immigrants that Mexico imposes on American immigrants.
These options are only notional, of course. They are intended only to help push the immigration debate in a more sensible direction. They simply illustrate the hypocrisy of the Mexican government's current immigration demands on the United States - as well as the emptiness of most Democrat and Republican proposals for immigration reform.
Mexico certainly has every right to control who enters its borders, and to expel foreigners who break its laws. The Mexican constitution is designed to give the strongest protections possible to the country's national security. Mexico's internal immigration policy is Mexico's business.
However, since Mexican political leaders from the ruling party and the opposition have been demanding that the United States ignore, alter or abolish its own immigration laws, they have opened their own internal affairs to American scrutiny. The time has come to examine Mexico's own glass house.
- - -
J. Michael Waller, Ph.D., is the Center for Security Policy's Vice President for Information Operations.
 The official text of the Constitution of Mexico appears on the Website of the Chamber of Deputies, or lower house of Congress, of the United Mexican States: http://www.cddhcu.gob.mx/leyinfo/txt/1.txt. An authoritative English translation of the Constitution of Mexico, published by the Organization of American States, appears on the Website of Illinois State University: http://www.ilstu.edu/class/hist263/docs/1917const.html. Quotations in this document are from the OAS translation.
Ping of interest!
So, I gotta ask, how many muslim immigrants does Mexico have LOL!
Grass or glass?
Look toward the future, combine the countries of the US and Mexico.
Every country has the right; not every country has the will.
But as you know, the rule is do as I say, not as I do.
But... but... family values don't stop at the Rio Grande!!
-GW "Guest Worker" Bush
It may work real well as a real protection of US borders.
I'm going to make fairly broad analogy here..but think of Mexico as the USA about 100 years ago...the establishement of an income tax here was designed to break up the mega-rich regional control of the country, acquire federal and local resources with which to build infrastructure in rural areas, and accelerate and facilitate the transition from an agricultural economy to a manufacturing economy. When we deal with the present Mexican leadership,who have read history north of the border, their gamble is to keep their oil assets and not be forced to invest in their countrymen , as ultimately many of the American "robber barons" families and corporations were 100 years ago. If George W. Bush is serious about bringing the benefits of the American Republic to Iraq, I expect to see him and his leadership doubly serious about the septic mess south of the border...not to prop up the status quo there on the backs of the American middle-class. Likwise, if he is intellectually and politically honest about homeland security, I expect to see real, functioning, constructive border solutions at the North and South that ultimateley enhance our relations with our neighbors. ("Good fences make good neighbors"). This is the only American approach to these issues.
You drop by twice a year to post your Atzlan crap?
It's about time someone posted something about reciprocity.
Where is our damned Ambassador to Mexico.
If he were not so busy schlepping his billionairess wifey this type of info would be public and put right back in their faces when they politicise and subsidize US politics and apply pressure using their citizens on US policy.
WTF is the Lamestream media on this?
They are in bed with their advertisers, and globalists so you will hear nothing negative about the slave wagers until there is catastrophe worse than now.
We have a slow 9/11 from lack of enforcement of immigration policies and laws.
yeah, just enough to stay current.
been busy you know. (it could work)
So many ignorant people, so little time.
"Look toward the future, combine the countries of the US and Mexico."
You may get your wish shortly. I'm thinking sometime this summer there will be a demonstration that will turn violent. Hundreds of thousands of wild-eyed, foaming-at-the-mouth La-Raza invaders will run amok. They, of course, don't know they're just tools of an insane globalist oligarchy that cares nothing for them. The blood will flow and the result will be an American populace so enraged that they will stop at nothing to rid themselves of these pests with or without the governments blessing. Kind of like a reverse Plan of San Diego.
Thanks! Very interesting. I kind of figured that the Mexicans would be more discerning than we are about who crosses their borders. I don't think there would be 1/2 million illegals allowed to hold a mass protest there, either.
Thanks for the link. At first I thought you meant that this was not the real constitution, lol. We are suckers. Wonder what the population would think if they read this?
Mexico Admits Poor Treatment of Migrants
Mexico's federal Human Rights Commission acknowledged that the country uses some of the same methods in dealing with illegal migrants that it has criticized the United States for employing. "Of course, Mexico's population law includes prison terms for illegally entering the country," said Indignacio Hermano, spokesman for the commission. "We figure anyone who would sneak into our nation must be criminally insane. Such persons must be locked up as a public safety matter."
read more at...
This is what happens to a lot of people who retire down there. They 'buy' a house, that is really never theirs and sometimes lose it! Better to rent down there!
So they don't like Saudi Arabian nationals, then?
In a nutshell, the Mexican Constitution days, if you're not a Mexican citizen, you get zilch, nothing, Nada, including legal rights. You bet we're suckers, real big time. The general American populous won't realize it, until the Mexican flag is flying over the Southwest. Right now, they're sleep walking.
LOL, Sleep Walk, I have it at the top of my Profile Page!
I wish some of the newspapers would publish this. Maybe they will talk about it on Fox News.
The Mexicans are unlike previous immigrants. This definitely needs to be read by everyone at least once! It should be linked on pertinent immigration threads. Here's an interesting link about Samuel Huntington:
"Strangely enough, despite the fact that he was buddies with Henry Kissinger at Harvard, he is registered as a member of the Democratic Party, and has written foreign policy speeches for Adlai Stevenson, Hubert Humphrey, and Jimmy Carter."
Didn't at least one Supreme Court Justice recommend looking at foreign law to rule on US cases? This article endorses that position, anyway.
You know Potlatch, if you and I and the world sees it, then it makes one wonder what's wrong with our elected officers. If the Dumbo's aren't sleep walking, then please give me another definition. The Pubs on the Senate Judiciary, Arlen Specter, L. Graham, Mike DeWine and Brownback that voted for amnesty are disgusting. All four obviously hid their heads in the forbidden zone.
They have more converts than you would like to know.
Selma Hayek's father is Lebanese, though he's not necessarily Muslim.
I'm convinced. Let's invade. /s
Sorry, I was trying to upload something, it took forever and then said it was too large!!
There are many here who disagree with how we feel. I saw some of them posting today - something about branding an A on the forhead for Amnesty! [not the branded A of past times!]
Well My My. The Fifth Column feels threatened. The little nation state they are setting up and nurturing in our midst might be...undermined. Can't have that, now can we?
Just remember darlings on this forum. This is the group that the Attorney General of the United States gives credit to for putting him in power.
Where's Tailgunner Joe and HUAC when you need them?
Here is a fun poison pill for the Mexican Lobbyist in the US Captiol (who are they anyways?), we make ALL proposed "reforms" of US immigration tied directly to mexico reforming its own laws on immigration of US citizens AND allows US citizens to have FULL land ownership.
Can't disagree with them there!
Amnesty didn't work in 1986, and it simply won't work this time. What's really troubling, is McCain smooching up to Kennedy. Chappaquiddick Teddy was the architect of the last failed amnesty, and all of the Dumbo senators are following the drunk again. This time over the edge.
Well, about all we can do now is wait, watch and fume!
ping a ling
Maybe the Mexicans can teach us something?
Good thread for any that missed it. It should really make you mad.
Every dollar spent in U.S. taxes for social services for illegal aliens frees up additional cash to be sent south as part of the annual remittances which provided $20 billion in 2005. According to the CNN news show Lou Dobbs Tonight (3/21/05), "Remittances, as they're called, are expected to become Mexico's primary source of income this year, surpassing the amount of money that Mexico makes on oil exports for the first time ever."
True. However he did make one interesting statement. Last year Mexico deported 250,000 illegal aliens (mostly from Central America). Too bad that we don't do the same.
That one on the clergy is the most significant, and should be a major focus of US attention... as well as the Vatican's
The Mexican regime (totalitarian/communist before Lenin!) murdered all the priests and nuns who defied the regime by preaching true Catholicism. Then it banned foreigners from serving as clergy. It was an atheist state's hostile takeover a religion, and is why Mexican Catholicism is often little more than perverse superstitions. The only difference between Marx and Mexico's founders was that Marx believed religion should be abolished because it was an "opiate for the people." Mexico found that people were easily controlled by controlling their medication.
Here's a real poison pill:
Sen. Coburn will offer an amendment to the immigration bill making English the official language.
Sorry, but if the economy of any nation with 100,000,000 residents is so affected by a $20,000,000,000 source of money, that nation is not rich.