Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/03/2006 9:23:30 PM PDT by ncountylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ncountylee
Fine - let's move on to the war of bombs and air strikes - that has always been the U.S. forte.
2 posted on 04/03/2006 9:26:26 PM PDT by MrEdd (I would have gotten away with it too - if it weren't for those meddling kids and their stupid dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
BTTT

Cheers,

knewshound

Brew Your Own
3 posted on 04/03/2006 9:29:32 PM PDT by knews_hound (When Blogs are Outlawed, only Outlaws will have Blogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Jack Straw wouldn't be fit to clean up after Winston Churchill's dog.


4 posted on 04/03/2006 9:30:14 PM PDT by coydog (Cowardice does not make you safe. It makes you a safe target. - - Dale Amon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Bump!


5 posted on 04/03/2006 9:31:59 PM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
“You can’t find any equivalent in Italian or Greek or Lebanese or Chinese or Baltic immigration to Australia. There is no equivalent of raving on about jihad,” he said, stating the obvious in a way most political leaders can’t quite bring themselves to do. “There is really not much point in pretending it doesn’t exist.”

You just gotta love the Australians. We're VERY lucky to have them as allies.

6 posted on 04/03/2006 9:35:39 PM PDT by hsalaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
If Styne leaves Vermont, I would imagine he's heading for Australia. Yes, let's talk bluntly about the stakes and the opponent.
7 posted on 04/03/2006 9:45:27 PM PDT by Ruth A. (we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

...Cold War chit-chat in its 1970s détente phase—when Willy Brandt and Pierre Trudeau and Jimmy Carter pretended the enemy was not what it was...

Come on Mark, Willy [Brandt] wasn't too bad. Sure he was quite a wuss, but he was no anti-American and was quite sane when compared with the even goofier New Zealand Left of his contemporaries:

Denis Dutton on New Zealand "idealism"/appeasement

"Willy Brandt, the social democratic Chancellor of West Germany, was once upbraided by idealistic members of the New Zealand Labour caucus over Nato. As Mike Moore tells the story, Brandt explained his position to the New Zealanders, and added, "Idealism increases in direct proportion to your distance from the problem.""

I think when compared with the Europeans in power today, Brandt would be more like Tony Blair.

8 posted on 04/03/2006 9:54:26 PM PDT by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

...Cold War chit-chat in its 1970s détente phase—when Willy Brandt and Pierre Trudeau and Jimmy Carter pretended the enemy was not what it was...

Come on Mark, Willy [Brandt] wasn't too bad. Sure he was quite a wuss, but he was no anti-American and was quite sane when compared with the even goofier New Zealand Left of his contemporaries:

Denis Dutton on New Zealand "idealism"/appeasement

"Willy Brandt, the social democratic Chancellor of West Germany, was once upbraided by idealistic members of the New Zealand Labour caucus over Nato. As Mike Moore tells the story, Brandt explained his position to the New Zealanders, and added, "Idealism increases in direct proportion to your distance from the problem.""

I think when compared with the Europeans in power today, Brandt would be more like Tony Blair.

9 posted on 04/03/2006 9:59:33 PM PDT by NZerFromHK (Leftism is like honey mixed with arsenic: initially it tastes good, but that will end up killing you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Has Steyn been reading FR???


11 posted on 04/03/2006 10:03:42 PM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Pokey78

Steyn PING


12 posted on 04/03/2006 10:09:38 PM PDT by FairOpinion (Dem Foreign Policy: SURRENDER to our enemies. Real conservatives don't help Dems get elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Perhaps Mr. Steyn should quit editorializing and take the job of "White House Press Secretary" since Mark Levin apparently has declined the dubious honor. May God bless Scott McClellan with a job more appropriate to his professional strengths or an enjoyable retirement. He just can't delivering his "pack of Lies" to the American people while pounding the heads of the adversarial press back in their place.


13 posted on 04/03/2006 10:09:46 PM PDT by dufekin (US Senate: the only place where the majority [44 D] comprises fewer than the minority [55 R])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
ok just a quick comment.

1) He says that the anti war crowd drew a small response.

He then goes on to talk about the Muslims who were offended by the cartoons.

He then went on to talk about the Muslim men who marched through London with the placards stating behead those who offend Islam.

Well the fact it that march attracted 10 to 15 at most, those with the placards have been arrested and charged, they were condemned in the papers by other Muslims and most Muslims in Britain registered there disapproval using the same peaceful means most of us do, mainly letter writing and phone in chat lines.

Lets recognize danger but lets not paint everything as dangerous when its not.

16 posted on 04/04/2006 12:38:58 AM PDT by tonycavanagh (We got plenty of doomsayers where are the truth sayers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee
cumulatively it begins to sound less like “Let’s roll!” and too often like “Let’s roll over!”

Great, as usual.

Actually, I thought Bush's SOTU speech came close to acknowledging the enemy (he said "radical" Islam, though, when it should simply be "Islam"), but there hasn't been very much follow through. The State Dept's response to things as varied as the dread cartoons to the arrest of Abdul Rahman, the Christian convert in Afghanistan, has been beyond muted. It has been conciliatory and timid and no doubt gives hope to jihadis worldwide that we are finally coming to our senses and seeing that they were right all along. The green flag over the White House, and all that.

And I think he's right about a large number of Americans being disgusted with certain aspects of the war - the no-go policy for mosques (weapons depots), the toleration of fanatics like Sadr, the acceptance of sharia in the new constitutions of countries that we control, etc. The purpose of this war was not to make the world safe for Islam, but sometimes it sure seems it.

Well, I realize I'm exaggerating, but I do think Steyn identified a feeling of unease that a lot of Americans are experiencing right now.

17 posted on 04/04/2006 3:50:37 AM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ncountylee

Well, okay, half the anti-war crowd aren’t meant to be in the country either, if they’d kept their promise to move to Canada after the last election.

ROFLMAO.


19 posted on 04/04/2006 8:04:10 AM PDT by proudpapa (of three.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson