Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Let's spend more money on useless studies, and more government control of everything.

The stupidity of the Democrats is only exceeded by their zeal to control us.

Carbon monoxide is only dangerous, when it's inhaled. The amount that is released when the meat pack is open is less than insignificant.

Stupid!

1 posted on 04/04/2006 1:29:27 AM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: FairOpinion

They have nothing else to do but protect us from red meat.


2 posted on 04/04/2006 1:42:02 AM PDT by Dallas59 (MOHAMMED LIED-PEOPLE DIED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

"Leavitt should at least order an aggressive nationwide campaign to inform consumers about the practice and caution them against relying on color rather than a sell-by date when buying meat, the members wrote in a letter."

Give me a break!


3 posted on 04/04/2006 1:47:01 AM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
The action against the use of carbon monoxide comes from the Michigan based meat packer, Kalsec. It seems as if Kalsec wants to used government action to kill competition. Kalsec uses a high oxygen gas in its modified atmosphere processing (MAP) rather than carbon monoxide. The carbon monoxide MAP technology will make Kalsec's obsolete.

Thing came to a head when the FDA gave approval on Sept. 29, 2005 of an application by Tyson Foods – a Kalsec customer – to have its carbon monoxide-based MAP process be given the GRAS or “generally recognized as safe” designation. When Tyson was granted the GRAS designation, Kalsec enlisted its Michigan politicians as well as long-time beef fear-mongering groups like the Consumer Federation of America (CFA)and Safe Tables Our Priority (STOP) to outlaw carbon monoxide MAPing. Their entire argument is based upon junk science for a MAP technology that has been used on meat for 20 years. The FDA gave approval of this high tech process in 2002.
5 posted on 04/04/2006 2:17:24 AM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Relatively speaking, it must be safer than nitrites, which remain in the red meats and become nitrosomines (a carcinogen) in our systems.


7 posted on 04/04/2006 3:58:57 AM PDT by RoadTest (The wicked love darkness; but God's people love the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Democratic Reps. John Dingell and Bart Stupak of Michigan, Henry Waxman of California, and Edward Markey of Massachusetts signed the letter, dated March 30.

I would just assume not have Pigboy deciding what I'm going to eat.

8 posted on 04/04/2006 4:55:39 AM PDT by WideGlide (That light at the end of the tunnel might be a muzzle flash.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

Gee, I wonder how Ron Burkle's gonna feel about this...


9 posted on 04/04/2006 5:06:53 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: FairOpinion

The reason carbon monoxide gas is poisonous, is the same reason that it keeps meat red, and the same reason that the treated meat is safe. Carbon monoxide bonds with hemoglobin -- preventing oxygen from being taken up by the blood. When used to treat the meat, it remains bonded with the hemoglobin & won't be released to the air.


11 posted on 04/04/2006 11:11:32 AM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson