Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McKinney is distraction, say the Dems
The Hill ^ | 4/4/06 | Josephine Hearn

Posted on 04/04/2006 8:20:50 AM PDT by Jean S

The bizarre scuffle Wednesday between Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) and an unnamed U.S. Capitol Police officer is winning the spirited congresswoman few new friends in her caucus. In fact, some Democrats are trying to distance themselves from her.

McKinney has been aggressively publicizing the incident, calling press conferences on each of the past two business days and even attracting a mention on the front page of The New York Times, something that the dozens of House and Senate Democrats combined couldn’t match when they unveiled their homeland-security plan last week.

Now, with McKinney facing a possible arrest warrant, the media frenzy is set only to escalate. The U.S. Capitol Police referred the issue to the U.S. District Attorney’s office for prosecution yesterday.

All of the attention has some Democrats concerned that McKinney is drawing the limelight away from their policy goals and Republicans’ ethical missteps to focus on a momentary, disputed encounter in a Capitol Hill hallway.

“There’s been a lot of eye-rolling,” said an aide to a moderate Democrat who spoke on condition of anonymity. “The national attention it’s been getting has been unfortunate. It’s becoming a distraction.”

A Democratic strategist concurred.

“This isn’t the view of Democrats that we want to project in the tough races, one of victims and race-baiting,” the strategist said.

McKinney often elicits strong opinions, even within her own caucus. She has a history of making controversial statements that delight progressives while irking moderates, yet even some of the caucus’s more progressive members have had disagreements with her.

She and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) no longer speak, not even to exchange greetings when encountering each other in the Capitol hallways, said two House Democratic sources. Pelosi twice turned down McKinney’s request to regain her seniority after she was defeated and then reelected in 2002 and 2004. McKinney first came to Congress in 1992.

McKinney spokesman Coz Carson said his boss is an effective member of Congress.

“She’s a gutsy leader who gets out in front of important issues,” he said. “She demonstrates bold and responsible leadership for the people who elected her to office.”

McKinney raised some eyebrows when she attended hearings of the select committee on Hurricane Katrina even after Democratic leaders had decided that only three Democrats — Reps. Gene Taylor (Miss.), Bill Jefferson (La.) and Charlie Melancon (La.) — would participate.

At her news conference Friday, organizers originally expected to have members of Congress join McKinney in a show of support. None ultimately appeared, although Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) sent a statement saying that “the most responsible and useful course for all involved would be to seek a resolution that would be satisfactory to both parties.”

Meanwhile, Republicans have had a field day with the allegations.

Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) called the incident — in which McKinney allegedly struck the officer after he stopped her at a security checkpoint — “disgraceful” and “horrible.” McKinney has said the officer inappropriately touched her. 

“I recognize that there are 435 members and I look like a staffer — sometimes an intern — and sometimes memory fails,” said McHenry, who is the youngest member of Congress. “And anyway, I don’t think it’s smart for any member to tussle with a Capitol Police officer. They’re well-trained.”

McHenry and Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) plan to introduce a resolution today to show appreciation for the Capitol Police.

Other members were more willing to give McKinney the benefit of the doubt.

“It’s a question of fact and whether the officer put his hand on her first or whether he asked her to stop first and asked for ID. The facts will determine who was in the right and who was in the wrong,” said Rep. Al Wynn (D-Md.). “I would be offended and upset if [an officer] put his hands on me prior to asking for ID.”

A House Democratic aide sided with McKinney.

“The notion that they would charge her is just beyond ludicrous, regardless of what happened. It sounds like a misunderstanding. She clearly wasn’t intending to assault a police officer.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: mckinney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: SlowBoat407

"Karl Rove told her to punch the officer."

Karl's mind-control machine is really something, isn't it?
LOL!


41 posted on 04/04/2006 8:43:10 AM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
“the most responsible and useful course for all involved would be to seek a resolution that would be satisfactory to both parties.”

This guy should write a book ... 'Platitudes for Dummies'.

42 posted on 04/04/2006 8:43:14 AM PDT by layman (Card Carrying Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead

LOL.

Now put her on the treadmill next to lolita.


43 posted on 04/04/2006 8:43:29 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
One more thing.

I sure hope it takes more than a lapel pin to circumvent the metal detectors. There are more than 600 elected officials working in the Capitol.

There is no way the police are going to recognize everyone and a simple lapel badge hopefully isn't the only form of identification they rely upon.

44 posted on 04/04/2006 8:43:56 AM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

We've got to love this. Hopefully it'll continue.


45 posted on 04/04/2006 8:44:57 AM PDT by b4its2late (There are good terrorists.............. DEAD ONES.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
Rep. Al Wynn (D-Md.) [said] “I would be offended and upset if [an officer] put his hands on me prior to asking for ID.”

Uh, Al, if you were walking away from the officer ignoring his call for you to stop, what would you expect? Should he shout out "show me your id" or simply taser you into submission? Does thst "D" after your name stand for doofus?

Oh, and BTW ... what did you actually say instead of "an officer"? Is Ms. Hearn covering up your own gaffe?

46 posted on 04/04/2006 8:45:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
"......although Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) sent a statement saying that “the most responsible and useful course for all involved would be to seek a resolution that would be satisfactory to both parties.”

Sounds like one of those throwaway lines like "endeavor to persevere"
47 posted on 04/04/2006 8:45:32 AM PDT by headstamp (Nothing lasts forever, Unless it does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

How about that, a dem beat a cop and we have another right wing conspiracy...

but have dem lawyers target right wing pundit or leaders such as Rush or Delay for bogus reasons... and that's not selective

This is war... they will not change their goals of transforming america into an arbitrary tyranny of false fighters


48 posted on 04/04/2006 8:46:33 AM PDT by JudgemAll (Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

"care about little guys like security officers who use false claims of "racism" and other B.S. to cover their crimes."

You are correct except that the person who tried to do his job was a DC Police Officer.


49 posted on 04/04/2006 8:46:45 AM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dead

ROFLMAO


50 posted on 04/04/2006 8:46:53 AM PDT by OKIEDOC (There's nothing like hearing someone say thank you for your help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

We need to make sure she is reelected to her seat in Congress. She is one of our best GOTV and fundraising tools and is a perfect illustration of why you do NOT want the Dems in charge!

Go McKinney Go! Your helping our team.


51 posted on 04/04/2006 8:47:08 AM PDT by GOPRaleigh (If John Kerry didn't exist then Karl Rove would have to invent him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Palpatine

She and House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) no longer speak, not even to exchange greetings when encountering each other

LOL


52 posted on 04/04/2006 8:47:26 AM PDT by bkepley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
“The notion that they would charge her is just beyond ludicrous, regardless of what happened.

Oh really..... That pretty much epitomizes the Democrats position on everything doesn't it?

53 posted on 04/04/2006 8:47:57 AM PDT by Niteranger68 ("Only 4 out of 3 Democrats actually vote.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

I don't see how they can say she's a distraction. A distraction from what? They have no agenda. If anything, she represents that sum total of their core beliefs.


54 posted on 04/04/2006 8:47:57 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
“The notion that they would charge her is just beyond ludicrous, regardless of what happened. It sounds like a misunderstanding. She clearly wasn’t intending to assault a police officer.”

Yeah, but she did assault the officer. I guess the devil made her do it.

55 posted on 04/04/2006 8:48:33 AM PDT by Banjoguy (I refuse to 'Google' anything at anytime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The Dems are too cowardly to say this about McKinney to her face and/or on the record and we're supposed to trust these gutless wonders with out national security?!?

SNORT.

56 posted on 04/04/2006 8:48:38 AM PDT by mewzilla (Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

"All of the attention has some Democrats concerned that McKinney is drawing the limelight away from their policy goals and Republicans’ ethical missteps to focus on a momentary, disputed encounter in a Capitol Hill hallway."

No bias in that statement. Like the "policy goals of the Democrats" and the "Republicans ethical missteps".


57 posted on 04/04/2006 8:49:05 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith

their second goal is to impeach president Cheney


58 posted on 04/04/2006 8:51:07 AM PDT by Palpatine (The lesson of modern politics is that no class is less fit to govern than that which governs us now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JeanS

Proving once again that the Democrat party is the party for people with no standards at all.


59 posted on 04/04/2006 8:52:09 AM PDT by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JeanS
The dems are just pissed that Cynthia's behavior is taking the wind out of their "DeLay & the GOP are the culture of corruption" sails. McKinney is a first class embarrassment to the human race and its fitting that she's a DEMOCRAT. (nany, nany, boo-boo) p
60 posted on 04/04/2006 8:52:18 AM PDT by demkicker (democrats and terrorists are familiar bedfellows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson