Not these guys..
Posted on 04/04/2006 12:20:19 PM PDT by caveat emptor
Media needs Stephen Harper more than he needs them
By Paul Jackson
Prime Minister Stephen Harper has good reason not to trust the Eastern-based Lib-Left dominated media.
So did Canadian Alliance leader Stockwell Day.
As did Reform party leader Preston Manning.
The Lib-Left media -- led by that wholly-owned subsidiary of the federal Liberal party, the CBC, the Toronto (Red) Star, the pompous Globe and Mail and their naive hangers-on and acolytes -- did all they could to mock, heap scorn on, ridicule and twist just about everything Manning and Day said.
During the 2004 and 2006 federal election campaigns, they tried to do the same with Harper, though not quite as successfully.
continued below...
But for the Lib-Left media -- which played to then prime minister -- now tug boat operator -- Paul Martin, the Conservatives would have won the 2004 election, thereby saving Canadians an another agonizing 18 months or so of deceitful and duplicitous Liberal rule.
Manning, being a decent fellow, always thought he would eventually convince members of the Parliamentary Press Gallery and the media establishment his vision of Canada was the right one.
Instead, the haughty pundits laughed at him behind his back, and painted glowing pictures of the crafty and cunning Jean Chretien.
Day, also a decent fellow, but a naive one, likewise underestimated the virulent viciousness of the political mob in Ottawa, and especially of the aforementioned (Red) Star.
He came out of the Lib-Left media abattoir looking like a religious zealot and a fool.
Ask Stock about it one day, and especially about the advice I gave him, which, to his open regret, he'll admit he ignored.
While Harper went through a similar meatgrinder during the 2004 campaign -- with the Eastern media for the most part dancing to Martin's slurs -- by 2006 our new prime minister had learned a thing or two.
I actually warned Manning, Day and Harper to stay away from the CBC, Star and Globe and every other media outfit of a Lib-Left bent.
Go to those you can trust, or who will at least give you a fair hearing, I advised, naming the Sun Media newspapers, Na-tional Post, Western Stan-dard, CTV Newsnet, Global TV and the like.
The experience suffered by Manning, Day and Harper have now resulted in the PM putting a severe screen around cabinet meetings and cautioning his cabinet ministers to make no statements to the media unless those statements have been specifically cleared.
Harper doesn't want his ministers -- or MPs -- to make glib or off-the-cuff comments that can be distorted and blown out of all proportion by a malevolent media.
How can you blame him for that?
Yes, the Ottawa press gallery huffs and puffs and censures Harper, but what did it expect?
Let's go back to the Brian Mulroney years of 1984 to 1993.
Mulroney loved the media. An avid newspaper reader, he also rarely missed the major TV newscasts.
He saw the media as friends, confiding in the ones he trusted -- including to his later shock, author Peter C. Newman -- only to find his trust and confidences were often betrayed.
Much of the Eastern-based media basically did a knife job on Mulroney, though he was, and still is, admired by much of the Quebec media.
Harper may find he has initially been too stringent in ordering his cabinet ministers and MPs to have tight lips -- but, let's be honest here, many are young and inexperienced -- and he may have maintained too much bitterness over the treatment of Manning, Day and to an extent his early days as Conservative leader.
What he must do now is cautiously loosen the reins on his ministers after they settle into their roles. Then, just as
cautiously, he should build
relationships with journalists he can trust.
Once the rat pack of Lib-Left types realize that some newspaper, TV and radio journalists have gained an entre to Harper and his team and are getting the big breaks and they are not, they, or their superiors, might realize they should start playing fair.
My bet is Stephen Harper is going to be around for a long, long time -- and that he'll be seen as a stable, steady and visionary prime minister.
The Lib-Left media are going to find out they need him far more than he needs them.
Great article! Too bad Bush can't do that here.
Even as far back as Nixon, Republican Presidents have seemed to go in with the idea that they can win over at least some part of the establishment press. They always think they will be able to do what their predecessors could not. It never happens, of course, but they have a pathetic eagerness to show how fair-minded they can be. I would like to see senior Administration officials calling out the press by name, attacking specific stories and reporters, and ratcheting up public pressure on the MSM. I have lived long enough to know that this will never happen, but I think it would actually go over well with much of the public.
I can hardly believe my eyes. The press intoned that at a party leadership meeting, Premier Klein should have an 80% vote of confidence.
Premier Klein got a 55% vote only. As the press ignores completely, under parlimentary rules, 51% is all one needs. Now the press is in full hyena and jackal mode.
King Ralph is dead
re National Post April 15th. (Ezra Levant). Et tu Ezra. The press is driving the demise of Ralph Klein. There is scarcely a legitimate reason.
Alas some memories are too short. Hopefully the Prime Minister's advisers will remind him of the hatchet job done on Prime Minister Joe Clark. Clark MUST get at least 65% quoth they, when Clark went to his membership. He(Clark) got 63% I believe. Clark bought the nonsense of the press and called a leadership convention. In then steps Mulroney- bye bye.
Talk softly and carry a big stick, Prime Minister. LOL
Not these guys..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.