[muawiyah]

Since the ACLU actually engages in the suppression of Christianity, Hinduism and Buddhism, but ignores Islam, doesn't it seem that they should be considered to be little more than an action arm of militant Islam?

Someone might well challenge their "standing" in court at the next "creche trial".

[Ernest_at_the_Beach]

There is a book,:

Unholy Alliance : Radical Islam and the American Left (Hardcover)

*******************************

And a review:

****************************************

Communism is dead. Long live Islam!, September 30, 2004

Reviewer:

Kevin Beckman (Sacramento, CA) - See all my reviews

It sounds absurd: why would Leftists make common cause with a religion that is diametrically opposed to everything the Left stands for? David Horowitz explains that it is really quite logical given the Left's first principle: America is evil and anything or anyone opposed to America is good.

Part I of the book is a brief history of 9/11 through the end of major combat operations in Iraq, and the Left's behavior during this time. Horowitz includes the reaction of Katha Pollitt of The Nation magazine: "The flag stands for vengeance, and jingoism, and war." Anthropology Professor Nicholas De Genova of Columbia University said he hoped for "a million Mogadishus." His colleagues objected, not to the despicable sentiment, but because of the bad publicity it brought their "teach-in." Our tax dollars at work!

Part II is the heart of the book: a history of the American and international Left. Horowitz calls them Neo-Communists or Neocoms. The Neocoms of old believed in the Soviet Union the way religious people believe in God. Those who spied for the USSR didn't see themselves as traitors to their country, but rather loyalists to humanity and an ideal of America that's never existed. When the Soviet Union fell, a few of them stopped for some introspection but most pressed on as if nothing happened. Communist historian Eric Hobsbawm put it nicely: "Without the Revolution, my life and my work are meaningless."

Now that they no longer have to defend an indefensible regime, modern Neocoms are simply nihilists. They know what they oppose but they have no plans for the aftermath of the revolution which they still believe will happen. They don't know what they want, but they know what they hate: the United States, capitalism personified.

So why are they allying with radical Islam? Horowitz says that the Neocoms still believe in Marx's dictum that "religion is the opiate of the masses." Once private property is abolished, the need for religion will vanish, and Islamic radicals will stop being Islamic and radical. The only thing standing in the way is the United States.

Sound insane? It is. They are. I highly recommend this book. Horowitz makes the insanity understandable.

[Unam Sanctam]

Why doesn't anyone hold Mumbles Menino responsible for the BRA sweetheart deal with the Muslims?

[the anti-liberal]

It has been my understanding that someone high up in the hierarchy in the leadership of the ACLU is a muslim woman - anyone know if this is true?

[Viking2002]

Another biopsy of the creeping cancer that's destroying our heritage and culture. I vote to up the ante, and become militantly intolerant to anything or anyone that wouldn't appear to be right at home in a Norman Rockwell painting.

Anyone who wants to split hairs over that generalization can kiss my Teutonic ass.

[nosofar]

This is highly suspicious and completely out of character for the ACLU. Personally, I warrants a federal investigaion. Not so much for the actualy fraud, but on the implicit suggestion there may be ties to Islamist elements.

[Brilliant]

They are Islamophillic.