Posted on 04/07/2006 12:13:15 PM PDT by Ooh-Ah
Despite significant blogosphere attention to the dubious (or, at the very least, excessive) Congressional practice of "earmarking," I'm not seeing a lot of attention on blogs today about this press release from the National Legal and Policy Center:
NLPC Complaint Alleges Ranking House Ethics Committee Member Hid Assets and Funded Business Partner's Groups with Millions in EarmarksRead the rest here.
The National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC) today disclosed that it filed a 500-page Complaint on February 28 with the office of the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia detailing hundreds of ethics law violations by Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV).
Rep. Mollohan is the ranking member of the House ethics committee and a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee. The Wall Street Journal this morning carried a front-page story about the case.
The lengthy complaint followed a nine-month investigation by NLPC, the ethics group that also broke the Boeing procurement scandal in 2003. NLPC alleged financial conflicts of interest by former Air Force official Darleen Druyun in negotiating the lease of refueling tanker aircraft. Ms. Druyun and Boeing CFO Michael Sears eventually served prison terms, and Boeing CEO Phil Condit resigned.
NLPC's investigation began when its review of the Financial Disclosure Reports of House Appropriations Committee members showed a sharp increase in Rep. Mollohan's assets from 2000 to 2004. A closer examination revealed that Mollohan and his wife had more than $2,000,000 in real estate investments with a former staffer, Laura Kuhns, and her husband. Kuhns ran a nonprofit, Vandalia Heritage Foundation, which had received more than $28 million in appropriations earmarks with Mollohan's help from 2000 through 2005. She was also on the board of other nonprofit groups which had received over $100 million in earmarks of federal funds during the same period with Mollohan's help.
Mollohan's 2000 Financial Disclosure Report listed his income-producing assets as being worth from $179,012 to $562,000 with liabilities of $170,000 to $465,000. Among the liabilities was Visa credit card debt listed as $45,003 to $150,000.
Just four years later, Mollohan's 2004 Financial Disclosure Report showed him with assets worth $6,313,025 to $24,947,000 offset by liabilities in the $3,665,011 to $13,500,000 range. It also showed him owning an oceanfront beach house on Bald Head Island, NC which was valued at $1,000,000 to $5,000,000. NLPC found that Mollohan was renting the beach house during the summer of 2005 for $11,975 a week.
The NLPC effort began in May 2005. Over the ensuing months, NLPC staff filed Freedom of Information Act requests and examined thousands of pages of real estate, financial and legal documents. Slowly a picture of Mollohan's finances emerged that was sharply different from the one being portrayed in the Financial Disclosure Reports...
A democrat? He can't possibly be a crook.
Not newsworthy. Move along..............
We need a good ear mark scandal to bring this issue to the front...
I heard one rep this week say something to the effect that earmarks are important because otherwise only the appropriation members get pork and thats not fair.
Move along. There's nothing to see here. Nancy Pelosi says only the Republicans are corrupt. Whatever it is Alan Mollahan didn't do it. And by the way Harry Reid didn't through a pile of tax dollars away on a boondoggle Mag-Lev train from SoCal to Vegas either. And the train guys didn't contribute all that cash to his campaign either. Don't believe your lying eyes. Okay Ms. Minority Leader, just click your heels together 3 times and say there's no crook like Abramoff.
For the MSM to be fair we must see this on page 1A for the next 2 years.
Move along. There's nothing to see here. Nancy Pelosi says only the Republicans are corrupt. Whatever it is Alan Mollahan didn't do it. And by the way Harry Reid didn't through throw a pile of tax dollars away on a boondoggle Mag-Lev train from SoCal to Vegas either. And the train guys didn't contribute all that cash to his campaign either. Don't believe your lying eyes. Okay Ms. Minority Leader, just click your heels together 3 times and say there's no crook like Abramoff.
I heard one rep this week say something to the effect that earmarks are important because otherwise only the appropriation members get pork and thats not fair.
per the NLPC complaint:
Rep. Mollohan is the ranking member of the House ethics committee and a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee.
Rest assured, the media will move along.
The LSM is trying to sweep the Democretin Culture of
Corruption under the rug, before the faeces strike the ventilation device.
Instead of this issue being the main fodder for Sunday talk-show discussions, BEHOLD! A non-story about nonexistent non-fallout from a WH non-leak of declassified information not involving a non-covert spookette.
What a freaking coincidence! /s/
Is there any way to get a complet listing of all the pending ethics complaints against all the Congress Critters?
This may put another district into play...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.