The problem with alot of those classes is it is based on theory - not quantifiable fact. Especially the people who adhere to the "Q" theory.
So...there are many theories out there put forth by many experts. And still, it is highly likely that any canonical gospels were included in scripture because they were recognized as having direct relationship to the apostles.
The apostles had their own disciples who preserved the teachings, and the gospels emerged from this setting.
So I don't think it is entirely accurate to say the writers didn't know Christ, as it is possible they were acting as "compilers" and not as authors.
"" The apostles had their own disciples who preserved the teachings, and the gospels emerged from this setting. ""
I would say with the exception of Mark, the apostles had disciples who had disciples ect. More degrees of seperation. Also, some of the Gospels were based on one and other.
It's just a common misconception, kind of like Mary Magdeline being a whore. I wouldn't adhere to the school of thought that she was Jesus' wife, but she wasn't a whore.
""The problem with alot of those classes is it is based on theory - not quantifiable fact. Especially the people who adhere to the "Q" theory.""
I agree.
I'm apologizing immediately for my ignorance, but this news interests me today. I have been ambivalent in my bible studies since Sunday School in the sixties. This news today, at least in the MSM, actually has treated the concept of Jesus Christ as a holy being as being a well, sort of given, acknowledged, holy being for the first time in my memory. I suppose that that fact is only in the interest of gaining ratings. I think that the commonly held view of most newsmen is that the religion of Cristianity is hooey.
I, however, am taking interest in the historical aspect. What was actually going on, that there was such interest, and texts written, about this person, Jesus Christ.
I actually never realized that the "gospels" were written by Mathew, Luke, And John. Perhaps that is the ignorance of childhood.
But, to read this in the paper today, that scientists have translated an ancient text that may be a missing part of the bible. I am intrigued.