Sorry. Bad reading that appeals to the reader's ignorance. The evolution of the vertebrate eye has been well understood for decades. Which is why all but the most dishonest creationist publications (evidently beloved by at least some here) have given up on pretending that the eye represents some kind of problem for evolution. Try again.
"Bad reading that appeals to the reader's ignorance"
Another angered response by an evolutionist. Why so testy ? Guess the article hit a nerve.