Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Blood Cleaner [device filters viruses from circulating blood]
Popular Science ^ | March 2006 | David Kohn

Posted on 04/09/2006 5:53:21 PM PDT by AntiGuv

No bigger than a pen, this device filters smallpox, Ebola and other viruses from the blood

It is a prospect that terrifies bioweapons experts: Terrorists release smallpox into an American city, spreading sickness and panic. Because the disease is untreatable and vaccines no longer exist, first responders and other emergency personnel would be particularly vulnerable.

A new invention, however, may help to avert the worst of this worst-case scenario. Aethlon Medical, a small San Diego biotech company, is developing a portable device that removes viruses from blood. Known as the Hemopurifier, it filters not only smallpox but numerous other viruses, including Marburg and Ebola.

The Hemopurifier resembles a shrunken dialysis cartridge, the rolling-pin-size device that purifies the blood of patients whose kidneys have failed. Both use a filter to remove toxins from blood. But unlike traditional dialysis, the Hemo-purifier also includes plant-derived antibodies, such as cyanovirin, that bind to a variety of viruses and eliminates them from the bloodstream. The plant solution can be modified to weed out even genetically engineered germs.

Aethlon has built two versions of its device. One, a foot long and an inch wide, is designed for use in hospitals; the other, the size of a large pen, is meant for use in the field. Both types attach to a pump. But the portable version could work without one, using the patient’s heart as the engine to force blood through the filter [see illustration above].

Aethlon recently shipped several Hemopurifiers to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta for cell culture tests on human blood infected with Ebola. Meanwhile the company has already completed its own tests in animals. Though promising, the Hemopurifier still has a few big hurdles to clear, the biggest of which is successful testing in humans. Aethlon is wrapping up safety trials in India and hopes to begin clinical tests in the U.S. by the end of this year.

How To Debug Blood

  1. Infected blood flows into the Hemopurifier through a tube extending from one artery.
  2. The toxin filters work like a colander, allowing small viruses through but not large red and white blood cells. The filter, which is made from a biocompatible plastic called polysulfone, is coated with special plant-derived antibodies that hold fast to the pathogens, ensuring that they don’t reenter the bloodstream.
  3. Purified blood travels back into the body through a second tube inserted into another artery. The human body typically contains about five liters of blood. The entire quantity can flow through the Hemopurifier in about 12 minutes. The process is repeated until all the toxins are removed—usually within a few hours.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: dialyzer; medicine; wot; zaq

1 posted on 04/09/2006 5:53:22 PM PDT by AntiGuv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry; b_sharp; neutrality; anguish; Fractal Trader; grjr21; bitt; KevinDavis; ...
FutureTechPing!
An emergent technologies list covering biomedical
research, fusion power, nanotech, AI robotics, and
other related fields. FReepmail to join or drop.

2 posted on 04/09/2006 5:54:15 PM PDT by AntiGuv (The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Gee, as Will Smith said in INDEPENDENCE DAY -- I gotta get me one of those.


3 posted on 04/09/2006 5:55:34 PM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Can we buy stock?


4 posted on 04/09/2006 5:55:44 PM PDT by WestCoastGal (The President says crank it up June)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

yes


5 posted on 04/09/2006 5:58:51 PM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Wow. I was always thinking there had to be a way to filter the blood but I was looking at it the wrong way. The way of blocking the redblood and haveing the viruses go through the screen is awesome.

This is going to he hugh!


6 posted on 04/09/2006 6:03:16 PM PDT by BookaT (My cat's breath smells like cat food!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Fascinating.

the device consistently removed 55% of HIV from whole human blood within 3 hours

7 posted on 04/09/2006 6:06:14 PM PDT by FReepaholic (I was FReepin' when FReepin' wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepaholic

Interesting..................it was in clinical trials in 2001.....time to get this baby to market.


8 posted on 04/09/2006 6:11:57 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MamaLucci; FReepaholic

That is definitely an interesting article. If I might venture a guess based on the dates and the respective information in the articles, this seems to have been first developed solely (or at least primarily) with the intent of treating HIV. What might've happened is that when it was discovered that HIV mostly hides out in the lymphs they realized this wouldn't work for that. However, they switched gears and have been developing it for other blood-borne diseases, especially bioweapon threats.

That's just conjecture on my part, but that would strike me as explaining the five year timespan and the different focus between the 2001 article and this 2006 article.


9 posted on 04/09/2006 6:16:35 PM PDT by AntiGuv (The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
That's cool, as far as it goes...

Two questions:

If one is re-infected (as a primary caregiver in a hospital, for example) how often must one's blood get re-filtered? How infectious is someone after their blood is filtered?

Oh, what is the cost per filter, and how are the filters disposed of?

Nonetheless, looks like good news.

Cheers!

10 posted on 04/09/2006 6:18:24 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

Yes, a $2 investment in March 04 would be worth $0.75 today.


11 posted on 04/09/2006 6:19:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (REAL men vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

This is interesting, but it won't "cure" you as viruses reproduce within cells. Even if you filter 100% of the viruses from circulating blood, that still leaves a large population of virons within your cells which will reproduce.


12 posted on 04/09/2006 6:20:21 PM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Well blow my dress up!!!!!!!!! How cool!!!


13 posted on 04/09/2006 6:21:28 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Yes, it sure seems like they switched gears. Still, a very promising development. Thanks for the initial post.


14 posted on 04/09/2006 6:22:42 PM PDT by MamaLucci (Mutually assured destruction STILL keeps the Clinton administration criminals out of jail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry

ping


15 posted on 04/09/2006 6:22:47 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Great! This is revolutionary!


16 posted on 04/09/2006 6:23:13 PM PDT by Wiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal

My thoughts too.


17 posted on 04/09/2006 6:25:08 PM PDT by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con, American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

They could miniaturize it, implant it and it could be left in indefinitely. That would work, wouldn't it?


18 posted on 04/09/2006 6:27:53 PM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

Kind of like a stent, huh? Interesting idea! I'm sure they're just focusing on getting to first base for now, but if this succeeds as hoped for then I don't see why that wouldn't be doable, but I am not a doctor.


19 posted on 04/09/2006 6:35:26 PM PDT by AntiGuv (The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Nice idea, but I doubt it will work. As noted, viruses spread via the blood, but they get into the cells, too.

Also, in a mass epidemic, there's no way something obviously as expensive as this could treat more than a few people.


20 posted on 04/09/2006 6:49:30 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BookaT
Wow. I was always thinking there had to be a way to filter the blood but I was looking at it the wrong way. The way of blocking the redblood and haveing the viruses go through the screen is awesome.

This technique is similar to the way I separated large proteins in solution from salts. A substance called a Sephedex gel is placed into a tube. The "gel" is made of small hollow spheres with holes in them. When the protein/salt solution is poured over the gel, the salt solution experiences the entire volume inside and outside the gel globes see example. The larger proteins experience only the excluded volume, thus they flow faster though the Sephadex gel tube.

This "purifier" adds a new dimension. The interior of the globes contains an antibody that captures the virus. It is sort of a "roach motel" for viruses. It's a very nice concept. The monoclonal antibody techniques created about 20 years ago paved the way for creation of custom antibody for use in this fashion.

21 posted on 04/09/2006 6:50:04 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Very interesting!


22 posted on 04/09/2006 6:54:11 PM PDT by BenLurkin (O beautiful for patriot dream - that sees beyond the years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands
They could miniaturize it, implant it and it could be left in indefinitely. That would work, wouldn't it?

No. The antibody that is capturing the virus particles is consumed on a one for one basis. When all the antibody is consumed, you need to replace the media with fresh material.

I used Sephadex gels as my first pass for removing most of the salt from my protein/salt solution. The salt is generally a consequence of spinning down a protein solution against a tube full of salt gradients in a centrifuge. Proteins sink until they hit a "buoyant" level. You slurp out the material at the interesting boundary with a pipette, then go about the process of getting rid of the salt and/or sugar used in the gradient. I usually finished the process with a membrane/osmosis technique.

23 posted on 04/09/2006 7:00:16 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Yea! A stent. That's it. That's the ticket ..
24 posted on 04/09/2006 7:02:29 PM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv; Dawsonville_Doc

a nod to he (DawsonvilleDoc) who brought this article to our attention :)


25 posted on 04/09/2006 7:03:35 PM PDT by King Prout (The UN 1967 Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Nice idea, but I doubt it will work. As noted, viruses spread via the blood, but they get into the cells, too.

Ebola replicates inside a cell until it explodes from the internal pressure. Organs of an infected patient become hard like an over inflated ball. Filtering the blood wouldn't do squat for ebola. The damage occurs in parallel throughout the body.

26 posted on 04/09/2006 7:05:15 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
Thanks for the science lesson but WOOSH! it went right over my head. :-) I said "indefinitely" but not "permanently". Making this into a stent and you could leave it in until the crises and risk of re-infection is over ... that was the crux of it.
27 posted on 04/09/2006 7:08:25 PM PDT by manwiththehands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Are there biotechs in Idaho? I'm in SSF. How do you like it there? I'm getting sick of renting...


28 posted on 04/09/2006 7:14:48 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Looks like a classic pump and dump stock!


29 posted on 04/09/2006 7:22:44 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Roach Motel! Ha - good one. Excellent way to describe the concept of this machine without too much work - very concise! :-)


30 posted on 04/09/2006 7:24:55 PM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin

Perhaps the idea is to reduce the viral load to a point where the body can handle the rest. I don't know; I'm just speculating. It would make no sense that they would develop something inherently and self-evidently useless (as it's essentially being described), but I suppose it's possible.


31 posted on 04/09/2006 7:32:42 PM PDT by AntiGuv (The 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Are there biotechs in Idaho? I'm in SSF. How do you like it there? I'm getting sick of renting...

Yes, but that isn't my line of work now. Here is a reference to some biotech in Idaho. I had all these experiences as an undergraduate in molecular biology at Revelle College, UCSD in 1976. My labs were very good and my profs were happy to exploit my lab skills.

I make my living as a computer scientist/electrical engineer working for a large employee owned corporation. My home is my office. I chose to move to Idaho to escape the crowding, traffic, high cost of living and anti-gun spew of Sacramento.

There is a move afoot to bring a medical school to our local Idaho State University campus in Pocatello. There is also a company that makes nuclear "seeds" for medical radiation implants that is planning to open a facility here in Pocatello. Our major employer right now is AMI Semiconductor. The Ballard Medical facilities are being closed after a recent merger/acquisition initiated some consolidation.

I actually live in Chubbuck...next to Pocatello. I like it very much. I sold the 1334 sq ft 4 br 2 ba house in Mira Mesa and purchased a 3900 sq ft, 4 br 3 ba house on 1/3 acre in a very nice neighborhood (179,000 in October 2000). I'm 154 miles from West Yellowstone. My wife and I visit about every 2 weeks from April until October. If you like outdoor activities, we have alpine skiing, cross country skiing, mountain biking, snow mobiling, water skiing and boating, fishing, hunting and hiking within a 15 mile radius. I can do all my important shopping in a 2 mile radius. Special runs to Idaho Falls (46 miles) are required for a big Barnes & Noble, Sam's Club, Circuit City, Target and Lens Crafters.

The only thing I didn't check out carefully before moving here is wind. The area can be very windy. Steady winds of 15 to 40 knots with gusts from 45 to 90 knots. We get about the same amount of annual precipitation as San Diego, but at 4500 feet elevation it arrives as snow in the Winter and some rain the Spring. Summers are warm and we have very low humidity. Mowing the lawn at 95 degrees is literally "no sweat" at 15% humidity. Lawn mowing is only necessary from mid-May until mid-October. Grass doesn't grown below 55 degrees. It can get cold here. The lowest temperature in my backyard this winter was -21 F. We had about a week of -5 to -15 in early December. Summers range from 86 F to 104 F. Between 90 and 95 F is par for a summer day.

Check out http://www.realtor.com for zipcode 83202 for an example of the current market.

32 posted on 04/09/2006 7:55:46 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Useful not only with outbreaks of deadly viral illnesses, but also to remove viruses in immunocompromised patients, in whom viruses would be deadly to them, but not to those with normal immune systems.


33 posted on 04/09/2006 7:56:45 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Ping


34 posted on 04/09/2006 7:57:10 PM PDT by Born Conservative (Chronic Positivity - http://jsher.livejournal.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Perhaps the idea is to reduce the viral load to a point where the body can handle the rest. I don't know; I'm just speculating. It would make no sense that they would develop something inherently and self-evidently useless (as it's essentially being described), but I suppose it's possible.

The blood borne hemorrhagic fevers kill too quickly for the human immune system to mount a defense. It takes nominally 2 weeks for an antigen to provoke any detectable production of antibody. Ebola will infect, replicate and rupture host cells in 2 to 3 days from exposure. Marburg has a longer incubation phase, so it might benefit from the filtration approach.

35 posted on 04/09/2006 8:01:04 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: WestCoastGal
...Aethlon Medical, a small San Diego biotech company

Stock? Might be a good idea...

36 posted on 04/09/2006 8:01:25 PM PDT by GOPJ (Doyle - Homeland Security sex-predator is a registered Democrat and former Time Magazine reporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

It might not be enough to prevent scarring, but it may lower the virus load enough to get someone over the hump so that they can survive. Pretty nifty. :)


37 posted on 04/09/2006 8:02:39 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

One more question: how quickly can you filter somebody's blood so that the virus is really and truly gone? If you can get one person per (say) 6 hours, from a purely logistical standpoint this thing is useless in a bio-attack unless you've got tens of thousands of them lying around.


38 posted on 04/09/2006 8:04:48 PM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Weren't people taking your blood out and heating it to kill virus and other pathogens years ago?

I think it was banned because it interfered with our modern medicine making a living.


39 posted on 04/09/2006 8:33:31 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Your observation is spot on. We have all manner of miracle treatments that can be applied to a very limited number of patients. In a full on epidemic, the resources will be completely consumed in short order.
40 posted on 04/09/2006 8:38:51 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

When they discover how to filter out the genetic bug which produces the liberal mindset, they'll REALLY be on to something!


41 posted on 04/09/2006 9:38:14 PM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Yes, but what do you do with the viruses that have left the bloodstream and are in cells?


42 posted on 04/09/2006 9:50:26 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
From Sephadex to GE Healthcare

I had to check your link when I saw Sephadex, and I finally came to discover how the name was formed, as a sort of contraction of Separation Pharmacia Dextran. I worked with it for a semester when it was made under Pharmacia's trademark.

43 posted on 04/09/2006 11:34:24 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul
Looks like a classic pump and dump stock!

Yes, but hopefully this gets other inventors to start looking at using this technology for other important applications. This many not be the solution to what it claims, but it might work for controlling other blood borne virus that don't attack other cells as viciously.

44 posted on 04/10/2006 12:20:59 AM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

bump


45 posted on 04/10/2006 7:47:20 PM PDT by GOPJ (Doyle - Homeland Security sex-predator is a registered Democrat and former Time Magazine reporter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

.


46 posted on 04/11/2006 6:52:10 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson