Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jveritas
we simply cannot allow them to possess any type of Chemical weapons agents even for a small quantity even for a defensive purpose,

I'm not sure that was even a part of the ceasefire or resolutions.

because if they were still in power and the appropriate time would have come they would have produce these type of weapons at much larger scale for offensive purposes.

But they could have produced them on a large scale anyway, regardless of whether they'd kept small amounts or not. When you're talking about trace amounts for testing and producing large amounts for offensive use, one has nothing to do with the other.

Like I said, I'd hate to see us push this point because it just isn't very strong. I think you'll find more military types agreeing with me on that.

40 posted on 04/10/2006 12:33:49 PM PDT by XJarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: XJarhead
I'm not sure that was even a part of the ceasefire or resolutions

I guarantee for you that they were not supposed to have even one ounce of VX agent or Nerve agent, or Mustard Gas.

I know that many will say "SO What?" show us the Chemical Weapon stocks and then we believe that Saddam has WMD. This is a weak argument because as I said before whenever they had the opportunity to produce it on mass scale they will do so. We toppled Saddam Regime not because of his stocks of WMD but because of his great danger to the region and in a world after 9/11 you cannot allow such a man to stay in power because even if he did not have large quantify of WMD, he will produce them and use them on a large scale when the opportune time will come.

If you know Arabic and read the many documents and hundred of pages about AL Qadisya Air base, will be shocked with their obsession with the Chemical Platoons, Chemical Classifications, Chemical training etc... Almost everything in these air bases revolve around the Chemical programs.

43 posted on 04/10/2006 12:44:00 PM PDT by jveritas (Hate can never win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: XJarhead
I can see your persistant call for caution on this one. Better to proceed slowly, try to link with other documents, and as yet untranslated ones.
One does not want to get egg in the face. Plus one does not want to diminish the already solid finds the Harmony Databases is producing. One false or weak arugument coming out of FR, and the L/MSM will decend like vultures on a carcass.
47 posted on 04/10/2006 12:51:35 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson