Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Collins: Why control of Iraq’s oil matters
The Washington Times Insight Magazine ^ | 04/10/2006 | Congressman Mac Collins (Ret. R-GA)

Posted on 04/10/2006 2:16:03 PM PDT by mnwo

Collins: Why control of Iraq’s oil matters

Commentary by U.S. Rep. Mac Collins

Recently, I had dinner with Prince Turki Al-Faisal, Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States, and one of the other guests asked the Prince an interesting question. The guest was a prominent Georgia Democrat and he wondered aloud “why the Republicans didn’t just admit that the war in Iraq was all about oil?”

I sat back, so as not to interrupt the gentleman, and then asked the Prince a question of my own: “Keeping in mind the strength of al Qaeda in Iraq today, and their relationship with Syria and Iran. What would it mean to Kuwait and Saudi Arabia if the United States prematurely withdrew its troops from Iraq and their government was to fall leaving the nation’s oil wealth in the hands of al Qaeda?” Prince Turki then looked me in the eye and said, “It would not be good. The United States must stay in Iraq.” Today, when we ask the question, “why must the United States keep our troops in Iraq?” The answer to that question is: “oil” and who controls that energy resource.

Those calling for the United States to withdraw troops from Iraq have a very short memory of just how Saddam Hussein used his vast oil profits. Iraq’s oil wealth was routinely used to purchase chemical weapons of mass destruction, which he used against his own people in Iraq’s Kurdish north. In the south, Saddam used his national oil treasure to put down a Shiite rebellion by destroying entire towns and draining the marshlands upon which the local population was dependant upon for their very survival. Those crimes against humanity were made possible by Saddam’s total control of Iraqi oil and the profits he received from Western oil consumption.

Saddam Hussein further used Iraq’s oil riches to support international terrorism. He routinely paid the families of Palestinian homicide bombers $25,000 as “incentive” for impoverished Palestinian youth to carry out terrorist attacks on Israelis. Furthermore, the 9/11 Commission Report uncovered that, “Bin Laden himself met with a senior Iraqi intelligence officer in Khartoum in late 1994 or early 1995.” The report also indicated that Saddam had personally approved of the meeting with Osama bin Laden. While this report does not show a direct connection between Saddam and the 9/11 attacks, it is clear that the Iraqi government and bin Laden had direct contact prior to the September 11 atrocities.

Despite Saddam’s creative use of Iraq’s oil proceeds to conduct genocide against his own people and fund international terrorism, there was still more than enough money left over for him to build massive palaces for himself and his extended family. It should also not be forgotten that these palaces were built during a time while his own people were suffering from starvation and a lack of essential medical care during the United Nations’ corrupt “oil for food” program. The United States’ liberation of Iraq put an end to this madness and introduced democracy to the oppressed people of this nation.

By supporting Iraq’s fledgling democracy with the United States’ military might, we are preventing the Iraqi government from falling into the hands of al Qaeda. Today, al Qaeda in Iraq, under the command of Abu Musaab al Zarqawi, is conducting a well-funded and organized insurgency movement. Zarqawi’s terrorist movement is being directly funded by Iran and supporters throughout the radical Islamic world with the hope of overthrowing Iraq’s newly elected democratic government. The reality is that if the United States were to withdraw from Iraq prematurely, then al Qaeda would likely succeed in overthrowing the Iraqi people’s new democratic government. Such an outcome would place Iraq’s oil wealth directly under the control of al Qaeda. There is no doubt that if this scenario were to be played out the resulting power vacuum would be devastating to Middle Eastern stability.

With Iraq’s oil wealth under the control of bin Laden and Zarqawi, al Qaeda would have a free hand to promote insurgency movements against the governments of the United States and our allies in the region, such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Israel. Bin Laden’s dream of establishing a new Caliphate under his control would be well on its way to reality. The end result would be economic and political chaos in both the United States and Europe as a result of our over dependence on Middle Eastern oil. It would also bring the front in the war against terror from the streets of Iraq to our homeland, a scenario never before dealt with in modern times and undeniably catastrophic to our nation’s security.

- Rep. Mac Collins, Georgia Republican, is a former member of the United States House of Representatives. Mr. Collins served 12 years in Congress, and in the Republican leadership of the House as a member of the Republican Steering Committee and as Deputy Majority Whip. He was also a member of the Ways and Means Committee and the Intelligence Committee.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; US: Georgia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bin; collins; east; iraq; laden; mac; middle; war

1 posted on 04/10/2006 2:16:06 PM PDT by mnwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mnwo

Mac Collins was one of the few decent Congressmen we had.

I wish he were in the Senate today instead of Isakson.


2 posted on 04/10/2006 2:17:31 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (America can do nothing for the Muslim world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnwo; jmc1969
"With Iraq’s oil wealth under the control of bin Laden and Zarqawi, al Qaeda would have a free hand to promote insurgency movements against the governments of the United States and our allies in the region, such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Israel. Bin Laden’s dream of establishing a new Caliphate under his control would be well on its way to reality."

I do hope without any malice intended. Believe me. Some of our FR membership stop fighting with some of us that try to expain with so many valid points that Abu is not only still very dangerouse, but that in most likelyhood he is still the guy running the show in Iraq, and not some mysterious Baghadi smaggy guy of unknown origin.
Though in a blink of an eye if some Saddamist choice to have him wiped out, chances it would happen within days.
3 posted on 04/10/2006 2:28:31 PM PDT by Marine_Uncle (Honor must be earned)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on or off this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.
Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking the keyword or topic Israel.

---------------------------

4 posted on 04/10/2006 4:58:04 PM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnwo
It's not only Iraq's oil, but we must control Iran raving Islamic jihadists from attacking Arabia's massive oil fields in a desperate act of revenge by the Mullahs, once the confrontation with Tehran gets underway.


5 posted on 04/11/2006 12:44:17 AM PDT by M. Espinola (Freedom is not free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson