To: blowfish
No, that theres no evidence for an intelligence that guides each atom on it's little errand.Of course, when humans build an implement they do not imbue its particles with intelligence either. That does not mean it was not intelligently designed. The circumstantial evidence (which is apparently more credible than eyewitness testimony) is enough to reasonably infer as much.
To: Fester Chugabrew
That does not mean it was not intelligently designed. Do you have evidence and observation it was intelligently designed? Do you have evidence and observation it was not intelligently designed? What supports you opinion? Any observation or evidence of either?
257 posted on
04/13/2006 2:34:40 PM PDT by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Fester Chugabrew
"That does not mean it was not intelligently designed"
no it doesn't. But to teach something in science class requires substantial positive evidence. If does not appear that God has left us such evidence or if He did it looks like we have not found it.
If you can get the education so that you can find and present such scientific evidence then people will listen to you.
But most ID proponents want the skip the hard part part of actually doing the discovery and supporting work and just force their faith into science by a vote.
266 posted on
04/13/2006 3:16:52 PM PDT by
gondramB
(Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson