Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: krb

"I counter-suppose that the number "5" would disagree with you."

Yes, yes, yes, but if you do an analytical algebraic topology of local Euclidian meterizations of infinitely differential Riemannian manifolds (bor shamov!), you will see that 5 is a nullity for these purposes, a "zero", as the article so clearly stated, and it becomes intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that 42 is holy and gravitrons have no mass!

You've gotta get into the spirit of the article, man!


62 posted on 04/11/2006 4:03:24 PM PDT by Vicomte13 (Et alors?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Vicomte13

LOLOLOLOL - post of the day. I am assuming you are using Riemannian geometry with the standard metric, for a topology...


72 posted on 04/11/2006 4:10:56 PM PDT by patton (Once you steal a firetruck, there's really not much else you can do except go for a joyride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson