His own generals thought he had them.
You can fool some of the people all of the time but you can't fool all the people all of the time.
He had them.
They are probably in Syria or Libya.
EVEN IF HE DIDN'T have WMD - and HE DID HAVE THEM, we had numerous other reasons to take him out:
1) He refused to comply with the agreement he signed after Persian Gulf 1 ( and fired on British and U.S. reconaisance plains)
2) He failed to fully cooperate with U.N inspectors
3) He was scamming us on the oil for food program
4) He tried to assasinate a U.S. President
5) He was funding Islamic terrrorists.
6) He was hosting Islamic terrorists
7) He very well may have been involved with the first World Trade Center Bombing, the Second World Trade Center Bombing and the Oklahoma City bombing.
8) He was in a position to threaten oil supplies to the entire world
9) Iraq, a terror state, was a keystone in a archway of terror states running from Afghanistan to Libya. Take it out and the arch is weakened. Take it out and you have Iran outflanked on the east and west and can threaten Syria from the east.
10) He was a dangerous lunatic who was a threat to us, his neighbors and the entire world.
What is it about the above that liberals don't understand?
Perhaps if it was written in crayons it might make more sense to them.