But do we really know that these were not mobile labs? I remember one FreeRepublic post that had pictures and pursuasive analysis indicating that these were mobile biological labs. Did the Bush adminstration give up to easily?
I remember when the vehicles first showed and I stated at the time that the RATS would say they were Ice Cream trucks for the children.
 |
| Two cases of arguments complete with form, content and conclusion. CASE #1 A. Five hundred reports of evidence say that Iraq had WMD. B. A mere six reports indicate Iraq didn't. C. Administration believes Iraq had WMD. Media conclusion: Iraq clearly doesn't have WMD. Administration is lying. CASE #2 |
Well, no. According to Powerline Blog, one group of investigators said that they were not labs, but two groups said that they were. WaPo admitted as much, but buried it near the bottom of their story where no one would notice it.
The worst part of this whole story is how the Washington Post and ABC misreport a story and once again, get off scott free. All they do is issue a pathetic excuse of an apology and theyre off the hook. Their logic undoubtedly being "Well, at least the damage was done."
The MSM is just lying, as usual. Their minds are made up, and nothing will persuade them that the facts aren't what they supposedly believe.
1999 discussion of WMD! Click on Zinni!
and click on Slocombe!
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/congress/1999_h/index.html
No WMD...No WMD...No WMD!!!! Hahahahhahaha, yeah, right! Why Operation Fox?