Posted on 04/13/2006 9:49:53 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
TEHRAN, Iran - Iran's hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad vowed Thursday that Iran won't back away from uranium enrichment and said the world must treat Iran as a nuclear power.
The comments were made as Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, arrived in Tehran for talks aimed at defusing tensions over Iran's nuclear program.
"Our answer to those who are angry about Iran achieving the full nuclear fuel cycle is just one phrase. We say: Be angry at us and die of this anger," the official Islamic Republic News Agency quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.
"We won't hold talks with anyone about the right of the Iranian nation (to enrich uranium)."
Ahmadinejad declared on Tuesday that Iran had successfully produced enriched uranium for the first time, a key process in what Iran maintains is a peaceful energy program.
Iran's deputy nuclear chief, Mohammad Saeedi, then said Wednesday that Iran intends to move toward large-scale uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges, signaling the country's resolve to expand a program the United Nations has demanded it halt.
"Today, our situation has changed completely. We are a nuclear country and speak to others from the position of a nuclear country," IRNA quoted the president as saying Thursday.
The United States accuses Tehran of using its civilian nuclear program as a cover to produce nuclear weapons but Tehran says its nuclear program is merely to generate electricity.
The U.N. Security Council has insisted that Iran stop all enrichment activity by April 28.
ElBaradei told reporters after arriving at Tehran airport that he believed the time was "ripe" for a political solution. He said he would try to persuade Iranian authorities to meet international demands for "confidence-building measures, including suspension of uranium enrichment, until outstanding issues are clarified."
The five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council — the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France — met Thursday to discuss the developments in Iran.
"We are obviously following this very carefully, and we want to see what the outcome of the discussions between ElBaradei and the Iranian government is, and when we get information on that we'll consider what to do next," U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said afterward.
Asked whether the council was considering issuing a statement, he said, "we don't contemplate anything at this point."
Also Thursday, China said it is sending an envoy to Iran and Russia to discuss the dispute over Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Assistant Foreign Minister Cui Tiankai is due to leave on Friday.
"Recently, there were some developments of the Iranian nuclear issue," said Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao. "We expressed our concern. ... We hope the parties should exercise restraint and not take any actions that lead to further escalation so we can solve the question properly through dialogue and diplomacy."
At the United Nations a day earlier, China expressed strong concern over Iran's announcement that it had successfully enriched uranium and called on Tehran to suspend enrichment. However, both China and Russia have repeated their opposition to any punitive measures against Iran.
On Tuesday, Iran announced it had produced enriched uranium on a small scale for the first time, using 164 centrifuges, at a facility in the central town of Natanz.
Saeedi said using 54,000 centrifuges will be able to produce enough enriched uranium to provide fuel for a 1,000-megawatt nuclear power plant like one Russia is finishing in southern Iran.
In theory, that many centrifuges could be used to develop the material needed for hundreds of nuclear warheads if Iran can perfect the techniques for producing the highly enriched uranium needed. Iran is still thought to be years away from a full-scale program.
The IAEA is due to report to the Security Council on April 28 whether Iran has met its demand for a full halt to enrichment. If Tehran has not complied, the council will consider the next step. The U.S. and Europe are pressing for sanctions, a step Russia and China have so far opposed.
Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said Wednesday the Security Council must consider "strong steps" to induce Tehran to change course. Rice also telephoned ElBaradei to ask him to reinforce demands that Iran comply with its nonproliferation requirements when he holds talks in Tehran on Friday.
On Wednesday, Iran's nuclear chief, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, said the United States had no option but to recognize Iran as a nuclear power. But he said Iran was prepared to give the West a share in its enrichment facilities to ease fears that it may seek to make weapons.
"The best way to get out of this issue is for countries that have concern become our partners in Natanz in management, production and technology. This is a very important confidence-building measure," he told state-run television.
We need to seriously consider our options in dealing with these nutcases. NOW.
This should (but won't) put to rest any notions anyone may have had that the enrichment is for "peaceful electricity generating" purposes.
Countries with nuclear electrical generating plants don't go around calling themselves "A nuclear nation".
Hey Iran, Japan was a nuclear country too. On August 8, 1945.
A lot more hat than cattle. He brags too much. Probably doesn't actually produce. But what if I'm wrong.
The toothpaste is out of the tube. There's only one course of action now, and it's going to get very ugly for Israel, and other nations within their range, if it doesn't happen very soon.
Iran Leader: 'We Are a Nuclear Country........weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!'
I am sure Japan will welcome your joining their lonely club, Mr. AmenIthinkbeenhad...
Ooooh, the Irani trannis got nuclear technology...
So, they can like power an arab deli now with their nuclear technology.
These nutballs are so not a threat.
For years, Germany protested that it's battlecruisers were really "pocket battleships" and England and the rest of the world dithered while the Nazi's built their air forces in Sweden and other countries and protested that their military buildup was for defensive purposes only so they could buy time.
Iran is no different at all. Civilian uses to buy time.
Then it's going to cost tens of millions of lives to put that genie back in the bottle again.
That should be the end of the UN though, happily. Not much good at providing security are they?
And no, I don't believe for a minute the new "super-weapons" iran is braying about. Just like Germany's superweapons at the end of the war. All imaginary.
I believe NOTHING that comes out of the Mullahs.
Soon to be an irradiated country
I seriously doubt we are going to do anything unless something
really bad happens to us. I don't mean to sound sarcastic, but something has to align all the "people in power" to forgo such an undertaking. And of course in the end, no-one will stand with us. I consider myself lucky that I live near a military base and a sub base. Should they get nuked, we'll be vaporized and feel no pain.
We waited too long, I fear. Even a tactical nuke strike will just defer their program and that won't happen in today's climate. They are using their time to disperse and further hide their sites. That just makes sense.
The new dipolomatic effort will be to try to get them to agree to monitoring and all that other bs which will be bogus. Sure, they will allow monitoring eventually of some select program, while buried underground will be the real program.
Shoulda let the Jews have at 'em.
....."We are a nuclear country "........
Soon, you will be a nuclearized country!,
(with sand that shines back into space)
They claim they will move up to 54,000 centrifuges, but is there any way to verify they are only using 164 of them now? It seems to me that a lie, understating their true capability would serve their purpose far better than anything else. Unless they can "surprise" us with a few nukes, they really have nothing to "make us die for our anger".
My goodness, that is quite a stretch of the imagination to say that "These nutballs are so not a threat". They are "so not a threat" to whom?
(We are a nuclear country...)
Now that you have figured THAT out, we'll show you how to turn sand into glass, it's real cool, you'll love it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.