Posted on 04/13/2006 11:19:51 AM PDT by doug from upland
That's good news, but will it hurt her? I expect she'll show up in a pink suit and answer every question with "I can't remember." It's worked for her before--she's the one who came up with the idea while she was helping to prepare the case against Richard Nixon in the early 70s.
Hillary will never get close to sworn testimony unless it is "I don't remember", "I don't recall", "I don't recollect it that way".
Unless Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Aurelio Munoz gets threats personally or to his family and friends.. or has an accident.. He probably don't know who he is dealing with..
What's all the suspense about? As an exclusive for FR, I'm going to release the Witch's testimony early:
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
"I don't recall"... "I don't recollect"."I don't recall"... "I don't recollect".
And last but not least.... (drum roll)
"I invoke my 5th amendment rights ..."
Strange memory loss afflicted both of them throughout their co-presidency, but writing their multi-million dollar memoirs seemed to refresh their hillbilly memories.
[Apologies to hillbillies, mountain-men, ridge-runners and `sons-of-the-soil']
Whoops, you forgot, "I'm sorry. I don't remember."
Sorry is right--sorry excuse for human beings!
With the fear if indictment and incarceration removed, their memories suddenly becam 20/20 didn't they.
I don't recall, my head is jello!
"In his ruling, Judge Munoz removed Mrs. Clinton as a defendant in the case,"
Isn't this a classic Clinton ploy? Save her from the biggie, but give her a small fall-back penalty, one she can manipulate (I don't recall), so it looks like the fix wasn't in to the public.
Doug, I'm sorry, because I know and appreciate how much you have invested in this, but I believe it will die aborning.
We shall see, John.
Isn't this good news?
Try to remember and if you remember then follow...
I hope you know how much I'd love to be wrong.
Yes, it is very good news that she is going to have to be raising her right hand.
What. How in the hell can this judge rule this way. It looks like an conspiracy and this judge is in the middle. What more does the plaintiff have to do. It should be up to a jury to decide guilt or not. Was it not her campaign? Did she not use Paul for a fundraiser? Oh, I get it. The judge used a crystal ball and it is the famous RAT ball.
Some day a legal beagle will get smart in a depo and say, You don't remember, but two years later in your book you wrote!
Slime begets slime, they protect there inter circle.
I meant deposed as in "removed from power."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.