Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

"In his ruling, Judge Munoz removed Mrs. Clinton as a defendant in the case,"

Isn't this a classic Clinton ploy? Save her from the biggie, but give her a small fall-back penalty, one she can manipulate (I don't recall), so it looks like the fix wasn't in to the public.

Doug, I'm sorry, because I know and appreciate how much you have invested in this, but I believe it will die aborning.


11 posted on 04/13/2006 11:47:06 AM PDT by John Robertson (Even if we disagree now, we may agree later. Or vice versa.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John Robertson

We shall see, John.


12 posted on 04/13/2006 11:51:14 AM PDT by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: John Robertson
"In his ruling, Judge Munoz removed Mrs. Clinton as a defendant in the case,"

What. How in the hell can this judge rule this way. It looks like an conspiracy and this judge is in the middle. What more does the plaintiff have to do. It should be up to a jury to decide guilt or not. Was it not her campaign? Did she not use Paul for a fundraiser? Oh, I get it. The judge used a crystal ball and it is the famous RAT ball.

17 posted on 04/13/2006 12:34:22 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson