To: r9etb
The word "amnesty" is being spun as much as the word "illegal".
LaRaza argues "how can it be amnesty if they are required to pay a fine?", etc.
IOW's "amnesty, by it's true definition," would mean that ALL is forgiven, unconditionally. (spin, spin, spin).
25 posted on
04/14/2006 7:04:45 AM PDT by
spectre
(Spectre's wife)
To: spectre
The word "amnesty" is being spun as much as the word "illegal".
That is because it would be amnesty for illegals. I would not waste any time reading la raza.
The Hispanic population here is not thrilled with all the illegal immigration. Are they "racists?"
29 posted on
04/14/2006 7:11:08 AM PDT by
P-40
(http://www.590klbj.com/forum/index.php?referrerid=1854)
To: spectre
The word "amnesty" is being spun as much as the word "illegal". True enough. But I think both words are being used as a means of avoiding any real analysis of the problems posed by the border crossers.
There are real problems -- illegals can impose welfare costs, for example.
And there are non-problems, too: It Mexicans are willing to work crops for a lot less than Americans will (if they will at all) -- and who cares?
The terms of the debate are hiding the real issues here. The problem can't be solved until those issues are brought into the light, and honestly discussed.
31 posted on
04/14/2006 7:17:11 AM PDT by
r9etb
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson