it's an old lawyer trick... say something you want the jury to hear that you know they shouldn't know about, the judge has it stricken from the record and tells the jury to ignore what was said. RIGHT!!!
right or wrong... you can't unring the bell.
My email to Scott McClellan.....
"We thank you for your tireless efforts.
On the Free Republic Forum there was a discussion today of the New York Times retractions and the effect on National coverage. It was noted that the Times will print a blatantly inaccurate piece and retract it later. But in the meantime the AP picks it up and papers all across the country prints the false article. They never print the Times retraction.
It was suggested that the first order on your daily agenda would be reviewing all the retractions to be sure the word gets out.
Such an action would be much appreciated and in the best interest of the country."
Bert,
If Scott followed your advice and starting doing that, it would drive the liberal moonbat reporters nuts. I could just see David Gregory cursing under his breath.
I really wish they would do it because it would throw it right back in the reporters faces and make them accountable for their crappy reporting. The world would see them for what we know they are.
it's an old lawyer trick... say something you want the jury to hear that you know they shouldn't know about, the judge has it stricken from the record and tells the jury to ignore what was said. RIGHT!!!
right or wrong... you can't unring the bell.
Way to go. I would love to see them implement this strategy.