Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

And in spite of this, I'm sure that many libertarians will show up on this thread to explain how "harmless" their "hobby" is.
1 posted on 04/15/2006 10:35:50 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last
To: Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; BIRDS; BlackElk; BlessedBeGod; ...
MORAL ABSOLUTES PING.

DISCUSSION ABOUT:

"The Road to Perversion Is Paved With Pornography"

I think this is a must read!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To be included in or removed from the MORAL ABSOLUTES PINGLIST, please FreepMail wagglebee.

2 posted on 04/15/2006 10:36:59 AM PDT by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Porn is good.


3 posted on 04/15/2006 10:38:41 AM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I don't believe pornography creates these problems any more than I believe that the Catholic priesthood requirement of celibacy creates pedophiles. The causality is backwards. Damaged and unstable men often look at pornography; pornography does not in and of itself create damaged and unstable men.


4 posted on 04/15/2006 10:39:55 AM PDT by domenad (In all things, in all ways, at all times, let honor guide me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

The culture and sex education also makes children more vulnerable to sexual predators. Take, for example, the Jame Rose Bolin out in Oklahoma.


5 posted on 04/15/2006 10:40:13 AM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Millions of men and boys are falling for the destructive myth that looking at "adult" porn is normal, healthy and harmless for "regular guys." Way too many are finding themselves handcuffed between two cops, under arrest for sexual conduct with a kid.

 I agree with statement #1 but it is none of my business if someone else chooses to look at adult porn.

As for statement # 2, that is way over the top. When you consider the size of the porn industry to the number of pedophiles, there is no causal connection. The pedophile would be trolling for little kids with or without adult porn.
 

6 posted on 04/15/2006 10:40:20 AM PDT by peyton randolph (Time for an electoral revolution where the ballot box is the guillotine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...

+


7 posted on 04/15/2006 10:40:24 AM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Not every guy who has sex with a minor is a pedophile. Most aren't. You may need to read that again too. There is a difference between pedophiles who prefer to have sex with children and child molesters who prefer to have sex with adults but will have sex with a child if the situation presents itself.

And just because some hot young goat bats his eyes at you and seduces you, that don't mean your a goat-f*#ker. Blame internet goat porn.

8 posted on 04/15/2006 10:41:16 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Dashing Dasher; pissant

IPW meta-Ping


11 posted on 04/15/2006 10:45:12 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Pornography is merely a symptom. The core problems are lack of identity and purpose, and in desperate fashion this yawning gulf inside the soul is filled with perversion.

Belief in God, not censorship, is the solution to the problem. But the modern American is too sophisticated for such a simplistic, backwards answer to his questions about the nature of the universe and his place within it.


13 posted on 04/15/2006 10:45:54 AM PDT by thoughtomator (That new ring around Uranus is courtesy of the IRS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
I'm sure that many libertarians will show up on this thread to explain how "harmless" their "hobby" is.

Before or after they look for their reading glasses? :)

14 posted on 04/15/2006 10:47:28 AM PDT by GOP_Raider (Git R Done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I was all set to agree and give my contibution to a discussion about porn, but this idiot went so far out into la-la land she cut off most of her readers.



16 posted on 04/15/2006 10:49:05 AM PDT by ansel12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

This is true and very important.

Take this as a warning, guys: don't assume it's harmless and that you will control where you go or what happens. It's a baited hook and the wise move is to turn away from it.


19 posted on 04/15/2006 10:50:55 AM PDT by RoadTest (The wicked love darkness; but God's people love the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

I have said before, and I'll say it again: pornography takes something which God has given freely to us (i.e., sex) and twists and perverts it into something which is poisonous to the soul. Sex is intended to be the highest possible expression of love between a man and a woman, it is NOT a recreational or "extreme" sport, in which the only goal is the physical gratification of the senses.

Sex can be a wonderful servant, or it can be a terrible master, and those who "have" to get their porno fix on a regular basis already know how their minds can become enslaved, even when they are unable to admit it to themselves, let alone anyone else.


22 posted on 04/15/2006 10:52:00 AM PDT by mkjessup (The Shah doesn't look so bad now, eh? But nooo, Jimmah said the Ayatollah was a 'godly' man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Somebody here posted last week that CFA isn't conservative but rather authoritarian. I believe I agree with that.

They really dont seem to get the difference between what is done by choice by adults versus what is done by force to women or is done to children too young to consent.


26 posted on 04/15/2006 10:54:45 AM PDT by gondramB (Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar's and unto God that which is God's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

[The easy access to millions of pages of online porn is speeding up the dependence and escalation to harder-core material and more.]



This story is baloney.

There is NO PORN on the Internet.


35 posted on 04/15/2006 11:01:02 AM PDT by spinestein (The mainstream news media are to journalism what fast food chains are to fine dining.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Just last week a congressional committee heard the gut-wrenching testimony of a 19-year-old telling how he began operating his own commercial Web site where men could view sexually explicit photos he took of himself. Justin Berry's nightmarish story is that of a 13-year-old boy in a broken home allowed unsupervised access to a Webcam and the Internet. A lonely boy looking for friends and love in all the wrong places immediately "found" adult males who seduced him with attention, gifts and money. Personal meetings led to his sexual abuse, which led to him sexually exploiting other boys by encouraging them to join the sordid business.3

I believe this story could be told over and over again, just change a few details. Children are SO VULNERABLE. Watch out particularly for the lonely child. That's why it is so tragic that the government, in the name of social services and even education and "character development," is corrupting the minds of children and damaging their moral sense with all this amoral, homosexual/bisexual/transexual/etc nonsense. And it is also why we cannot participate by simply demanding our own "free speech" time with the kids. They are being desensitized and corrupted with this non-stop sex stuff, not just with pornography. When kids get the right to vote and drink and be independent of their parents, then we can talk about free speech and free choices in moral matters. Until then, where are the adults whose job it is to supervise and protect the young? Why is the government the enemy of children in terms of their development of a moral sense and virtue?

38 posted on 04/15/2006 11:05:03 AM PDT by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
[And in spite of this, I'm sure that many libertarians will show up on this thread to explain how "harmless" their "hobby" is.]


Yeah, stupid libertarians, who foolishly don't want the government arresting everyone who looks at nudie pictures.
39 posted on 04/15/2006 11:09:22 AM PDT by spinestein (The mainstream news media are to journalism what fast food chains are to fine dining.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

Any male that believes that other males looking at adult porn is going to cause them to become pedophiles is probably a pedophile themselves. Classic projection.


43 posted on 04/15/2006 11:19:39 AM PDT by ndt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
Porn is anything but "harmless". But it's not just a "male" problem.

Porn is a problem for men and women. Men get the kicks out of it, but women tend to get self righteous and judgmental about it.

If it's a problem it's a problem for all of us.

46 posted on 04/15/2006 11:23:36 AM PDT by manwiththehands ("'Rule of law'? We don't need no stinkin' rule of law! We want amnesty, muchacho!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

>And in spite of this, I'm sure that many libertarians will show up on this thread to explain how "harmless" their "hobby" is.<

Not only "libertarians", but scads of "librarians"!


47 posted on 04/15/2006 11:23:50 AM PDT by Paperdoll (On the cutting edge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-38 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson