Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: yuta250
Extremely dishonest and disingenuous if you to imply that this swap was proposed by Bush, as every news story about it appears to suggest the proposal was initiated by Israel as a means to strengthen the PLO and neutralize Hamas (in addition to springing Pollard). Americans certainly achieve no benefit from this exchange.

Personally I doubt this story, but you are aware Barghouti is being held by Israel aren't you? If Israel wanted to release him for any reason, they'd release him. There's no quid pro quo required from America.

126 posted on 04/16/2006 6:57:07 AM PDT by SJackson (The Pilgrims—Doing the jobs Native Americans wouldn’t do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
If Israel wanted to release him for any reason, they'd release him. There's no quid pro quo required from America.

Israel might want to release him for purely strategic reasons but realizes that their domestic politics precludes them from doing this except under the smokescreen of "trading him for Pollard". The US benefits not at all from either end of this transaction.

128 posted on 04/16/2006 7:04:44 AM PDT by yuta250
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson