Skip to comments.
Networks challenge indecency ruling
Waterbury Republican-American ^
| April 15, 2006
| A.P.
Posted on 04/15/2006 5:51:33 PM PDT by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Sounds like a crock of "S" word to me. Adults can choose what they and their children watch. If it's offensive - turn it off.
To: Graybeard58
I disagree. if the broadcasters get away with using filthy langiuage the airwaves will be filled witf f words and s words just like the movies are filled with them today to the point where you cant see a decent movie without getting your ears burned.
To: sgtbono2002
Then turn it off if it offense you. The govenment should not be involved in TV.
To: Graybeard58
Give us back "family time" TV hours. Save the vulgarities for late night or cable. Civility is sorely lacking from our society.
4
posted on
04/15/2006 6:07:39 PM PDT
by
Ruth A.
(we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
To: Ruth A.
Civility is sorely lacking from our society. I couldn't agree more, but I doubt if the FCC is the one to bring it back.
5
posted on
04/15/2006 6:11:14 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: Ruth A.
Civility is sorely lacking from our society. I agree with that.
Call me a moron, idiot or troll for saying it but civility is lacking right here at F.R. at times.
6
posted on
04/15/2006 6:13:23 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: napscoordinator
I dont need to turn it off now , it isnt there. It shouldnt be there . If you wish to hear filthy language on your TV rent a movie. The government IS in TV and will stay there. Most movies are censored now, in some like Smokey and the bandit, the censorship does ruin the movie.
One of the prices that have to be paid.
The US doesnt need foul obscene language proliferating its airwaves. The government has always censored radio and radio traffic among users of commercial radio's. I doubt it will stop.
To: Graybeard58; albertp; Allosaurs_r_us; Abram; Americanwolfsbrother; AlexandriaDuke; Americanwolf; ...
Libertarian ping! To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
8
posted on
04/15/2006 6:39:40 PM PDT
by
traviskicks
(http://www.neoperspectives.com/israel_palestine_conflict.htm)
To: sgtbono2002
Most movies are censored now, in some like Smokey and the bandit, the censorship does ruin the movie. It ruined it in "My Cousin Vinney" too.
One of the funniest movies ever but the version released for tv was a dud.
9
posted on
04/15/2006 6:43:19 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Graybeard58
To: Graybeard58
"Call me a moron, idiot or troll for saying it but civility is lacking right here at F.R. at times."
Ok, you moronic, idiotic, troll! Unfortunately, you're also absolutely right, so I guess that means you're neither moronic nor idiotic, and probably not really a troll, either. (and I do hope you have a sense of humor about being called such things, even in jest, by someone who doesn't know you well enough to safely presume to do so...)
11
posted on
04/15/2006 6:59:01 PM PDT
by
Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
To: sgtbono2002
Most movies are censored now, in some like Smokey and the bandit, the censorship does ruin the movie. In some movies the original cast records a "tamer" version and unless you knew the script from the theater version you wouldn't really notice. Then there was Die Hard 2 where John McClane's (Bruce Willis) line was changed from "Yippee-kye-yay, M*#*@*# F(#*#*#!" to "Yippee-kye-yay, Mr. Falcon!". First, the line made no sense. Second, the person who said "Mr. Falcon" didn't sound anything like Bruce Willis. It would have been far less jarring to just remove the line altogether.
12
posted on
04/15/2006 7:44:54 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(If you have a leaking pipe, you shut off the water valve before deciding on amnesty for the puddles.)
To: Graybeard58
Here's my concern: the only reason there's any argument over what's indecent and what ain't is that we haven't sold the airwaves yet. To me, the big question isn't whether the seven dirty words are dirty or not, but WTF is the FCC doing holding on to any jurisdiction over this stuff? Why is the federal government holding property like airwaves unnecessarily? These could have been sold YEARS ago and the owners would have been paying into the federal tax coffers instead of Americans.
13
posted on
04/15/2006 8:32:43 PM PDT
by
LibertarianInExile
('Is' and 'amnesty' both have clear, plain meanings. Are Billy Jeff and the President related?)
To: Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.) Hey, I made E-4 twice in 4 years in the Air Force that should have made me an E-8 but it didn't.
It was called A/1C in those days which should tell you how ancient I am.
I made that idiotic, moronic, troll comment in jest, hoping someone would see the humor in it.
14
posted on
04/15/2006 8:57:21 PM PDT
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: sgtbono2002
I disagree. if the broadcasters get away with using filthy langiuage the airwaves will be filled witf f words and s words just like the movies are filled with them today to the point where you cant see a decent movie without getting your ears burned. Do you think that content from private broadcasters (satellite radio & cable, for eg.) should be subject to FCC censorship as well?
15
posted on
04/15/2006 8:57:43 PM PDT
by
Ken H
To: Graybeard58
Sounds like the FCC is as effective as the ICE.
To: sgtbono2002
The US doesnt need foul obscene language proliferating its airwaves. The government has always censored radio and radio traffic among users of commercial radio's. I doubt it will stop.
Your right on both counts. I just wish the government would stay out and the networks would clean up its own mess.
To: Ken H
If you are a Ham operator you are subject to FCC regulation, What is more private than that. There is no such thing as being a "private" broadcaster. When you put messages in the air they are far from private.
To: napscoordinator
That would be the best solution, but they wont.
Wave a dollar bill at them and anything goes. Ask Stern.
To: Graybeard58
I only made E-4 once, a month after they changed it from Sergeant to Senior Airman. They argued that I wasn't qualified for it because I hadn't gotten my 5-level certification as a photographer, and tried to ignore the fact that I had made it as an aircraft mechanic before I wrecked my knees and had to retrain. Took me another year (me and about 10-15,000 others) to make Sgt. Late 70's? Something like that. By then we'd become a little less like the Army. One of my HS buddies had enlisted in the Army, and told me they were busting people whose shoes weren't shined satisfactorily at the end of the day. (In the USAF, they might bust you if they weren't shined properly at the beginning of the day, but they did know what they had done to you that day...)
I figured you'd have a sense of humor about it, but I've figured wrong once in a while, too. Thanks! Have a happy and blessed Easter!
20
posted on
04/16/2006 7:31:58 AM PDT
by
Old Student
(WRM, MSgt, USAF(Ret.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson