Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senators Back Direct Talks With Iran
star tribune ^ | April 16, 2006 | HOPE YEN

Posted on 04/16/2006 2:45:10 PM PDT by Flavius

WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. must aggressively pursue diplomacy with Iran about its disputed nuclear program, including direct talks, before considering a military option, lawmakers from both parties said Sunday.

"I think that would be useful,'' said GOP Sen. Richard Lugar, chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, when asked on ABC's "This Week'' about having direct talks.

"The Iranians are a part of the energy picture,'' Lugar said. "We need to talk about that.''

Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., agreed, saying the U.S. has ceded too much diplomacy to Europe.

"I happen to believe you need direct talks,'' Dodd said on "Fox News Sunday.'' "It doesn't mean you agree with them. It doesn't mean you support them. It doesn't mean you have formal diplomatic relations. But there's an option.''

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; dodd; iran; richardlugar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 04/16/2006 2:45:12 PM PDT by Flavius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Let’s never again see useful and Lugar in the same sentence.
2 posted on 04/16/2006 2:46:46 PM PDT by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"Peace in our time"
3 posted on 04/16/2006 2:46:50 PM PDT by Flavius (Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I hope whomever is tasked with these 'talks' remembers he is talking to a man who held our diplomats hostage for nearly a year (I think, not sure of the length of time) - perhaps Jimmy Carter would like to represent us?


4 posted on 04/16/2006 2:47:41 PM PDT by SusaninOhio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
It's Richard Lugar Time!
5 posted on 04/16/2006 2:49:19 PM PDT by Solamente (Let all the poisons that lurk in the mud hatch out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
I thought we were imposing our views on the rest of the world, and they hate us and we need to stop it.

At least I seem to remember hearing that somewhere ;)

6 posted on 04/16/2006 2:50:21 PM PDT by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Oh!!!!!! You mean just like Lord Chamberlain did with A.H. at Munich to secure "Peace in Our Time!"????


7 posted on 04/16/2006 2:50:23 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

So they get a quote from one "Republican"(Lugar) and a differing quote from another(Hunter) and yet the headline is what it is.. amazing.


8 posted on 04/16/2006 2:50:25 PM PDT by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Can there be a bigger waste of time??


9 posted on 04/16/2006 2:50:46 PM PDT by Huck (REINTRODUCE THE REID IMMIGRATION BILL!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

What part of Bush will not negotiate with terrorists do they not understand? They would like to see Bush back down on that.


10 posted on 04/16/2006 2:50:55 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (Proud soldier in the American Army of Occupation..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

In the name of God, Senators, talk time is OVER!!!


11 posted on 04/16/2006 2:51:02 PM PDT by ICE-FLYER (God bless and keep the United States of America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
OK, lemme get this straight:

Problem with US dealing with Iraq = "unilateralism."

Problem with US dealing with Iran = "multilateralism."

Glad that's cleared up.

12 posted on 04/16/2006 2:54:25 PM PDT by Snickersnee (Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
"aggressively pursue diplomacy!" I love it! Those diplomatic warriors will have the mullahs on their knees! To the meetings! Up the referenda!
13 posted on 04/16/2006 2:57:55 PM PDT by marsh_of_mists
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Oh, yes. What a brilliant idea.

Now that Iran has proven to every sentient being that they aren't interested in negotiations, in come the treasonous swine on the Left to insist that, no, it's really the case that we need to get more "personal" with the lunatics in Iran.

Rather typical, isn't it, that when the fascists treat everyone like clowns liberals insist that being a clown is th *only* rational thing to do.

To the rescue. Again. The American Stalinist Left sides with the enemy.

14 posted on 04/16/2006 3:00:40 PM PDT by Reactionary (The Moonbats Need an Enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huck
Can there be a bigger waste of time?

UN Security Council.

15 posted on 04/16/2006 3:04:08 PM PDT by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r

Good one. What the hell is the point? I'd like the president or the Sec of State to explain why we should waste our time, especially when a 15-0 vote from the UN is apparantly worthless. They'll behave as if it were a 1-14 vote anyway. So why bother?


16 posted on 04/16/2006 3:10:52 PM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Duo dick-heads.
17 posted on 04/16/2006 3:11:51 PM PDT by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
Tehran Jim McDermott???
18 posted on 04/16/2006 3:23:45 PM PDT by Doctor Raoul (CODE PINK has blood on their hands and they can never, never wash it off)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Hey, there's tons of bribe money to be made in Iran. Just look at the Oil for Food program in Iraq.


19 posted on 04/16/2006 3:25:24 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ICE-FLYER

Thank you. I second your large, bold statement.


20 posted on 04/16/2006 3:38:11 PM PDT by AmericanChef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson