Picture a busload of gay European tourists dropped off in Waterloo, Iowa.
1 posted on
04/16/2006 3:38:41 PM PDT by
dukeman
To: dukeman
2 posted on
04/16/2006 3:43:36 PM PDT by
SIDENET
(Gonna shake it, gonna break it, let's forget it better still)
To: dukeman
Cities are selling their souls for short-term quick revenue, but the long run, disgusted families will leave and cities' tax bases will erode.
To: dukeman
the city expects 20,000 gay men to gather for the annual White Party, bringing $4 million with them. White party? White? Symbol of purity?
I gotta hand it to gays --they're masters of marketing. Even the term, "gay" is pretty misleading, as most gay dudes are self-destructive, nihilistic, and depressed.
Rainbows, too --what could be nicer? Everybody likes that...
It's funny --we collect statistics for EVERYTHING; how much your life is shortened by 30 minutes in the same room as an active smoker, for example, and yet we never hear how many years on average the lives of actively gay men are shortened.
The one statistic I've heard is that 25% of gay men in SF are HIV+.
That's it.
4 posted on
04/16/2006 3:45:42 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: dukeman
5 posted on
04/16/2006 3:45:48 PM PDT by
SweetCaroline
( have ye asked nothing in my name: ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be full)
To: dukeman
Too bad the Christian dollar is not so sought after.
To: dukeman
The country's most popular destinations for gay and lesbian travelers for the 12 months ending August 2005:
1. New York City 2. Las Vegas 3. San Francisco 4. Los Angeles/W. Hollywood 5. Fort Lauderdale, Fla. 6. Washington, D.C. 7. Chicago 8. Miami/South Beach 9. Palm Springs 10. San Diego Source: Community Marketing Inc.What?! San Francisco is number THREE?!
Interesting that 1% of the population has SO much "voice," money and power.
8 posted on
04/16/2006 3:52:28 PM PDT by
starfish923
(Socrates: It's never right to do wrong.)
To: dukeman
They're just like everyone else at yet they travel as a segregated, monolithic bloc with its own "lifestyle" to cater to. They're oppressed and downtrodden and yet have scads of cash to burn vacationing. They're unique individuals who just want to be treated like complete human beings and yet are defined by their peculiar sexual attractions. They represent 2% of the population and yet seem to have a demographic influence outweighing all but the largest minorities; there are a lot of sub-groups that 2% of the population is is a part of that no one every notices. Why is this? Could it be an agenda???
To: dukeman
Life imitates art? Simpsons had an episode where Springfield goes gay to attract gay tourists.
13 posted on
04/16/2006 4:59:15 PM PDT by
sagar
To: dukeman
This reminds me that movie--you know the one--the woman has several problems, finds out her boyfriend is gay; then she meets a man she likes in a bar, and he tells that he is gay; and she runs into the parking lot screaming: "Is everybody gay??? Is this The Twilight Zone???"
14 posted on
04/16/2006 5:22:29 PM PDT by
Savage Beast
(The Spirit of Flight 93 is the Spirit of America.)
To: dukeman
That's odd, I didn't see Sodom or Gomorrah on the list.
16 posted on
04/16/2006 6:10:38 PM PDT by
CrazyIvan
(If you read only one book this year, read "Stolen Valor".)
To: dukeman
19 posted on
04/16/2006 7:44:24 PM PDT by
noblejones
(Ben Stein for President, 2008.)
To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping!
To be included in or removed from the
HOMOSEXUAL AGENDA PING LIST,
please FReepMail either DBeers or DirtyHarryY2k.
Free Republic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword = homosexualagenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
"I'm just grateful that they've taken notice," she said. "Look at the gays and lesbians, they have money!"
? ? ?
I am starting to suspect the veracity of ALL the 'studies' and 'research' that surmise all this 'gay' money is out there. Why would the financial 'gay' research be any less junk science then all the other studies shown to be nothing more that homosexual agenda driven junk science?
27 posted on
04/17/2006 7:03:05 AM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: dukeman
Thankfully there is not a TX city on the list.
28 posted on
04/17/2006 7:18:02 AM PDT by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
To: dukeman
and given Palm Springs bigger-budgeted competitors. bigger budgeted?
bugger bidgeted?
bigger buggered?
Bugger budgeted?
Oh, I give up.
32 posted on
04/17/2006 1:00:08 PM PDT by
Tokra
(I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
To: dukeman
In other words, "Bring your orgies on down"! Why not ask "Swingers" to "Bring your wife swapping on down"?
Is there no limits to what people can decend anymore?
35 posted on
04/17/2006 1:25:06 PM PDT by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson