Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WoofDog123

I recently saw a documentary which compared the two rifles. The M-16 is lighter to carry around, the bullets weigh less so a soldier can carry more, and it is more accurate. On the other hand, it is more prone to jamming since it can't stand up as well to field conditions.
Probably the biggest advantage of the Russian made rifle is it's stopping power. In Vietnam a soldier hiding behind jungle trees would generally be safe from an M-16 round, while a bullet from a Kalashnikov would likely go right through the tree and hit the soldier.


157 posted on 04/18/2006 10:38:00 AM PDT by finnigan2 (OUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: finnigan2
The M-16 is lighter to carry around, the bullets weigh less so a soldier can carry more, and it is more accurate.

The Vietnam War-era M16A1 rifle weighed in at around 6.5 pounds, a little over 7.5 loaded, depending on accessories carried [sling, cleaning kit in butt, etc] The original milled-receiver AK-47 weighed 4.3 kg [9.5 lb] with an empty magazine in place, the later AKM stamped-receiver version introduced around 1960 3.14 kg empty, about 7 pounds even. Weight of the loaded 30-round magazine is .6 kg, about a pound and a half.

The AK47 and AKM however, have 16-inch barrels, making them really more an equivalent of the Vietnam War period XM177 *Car15* or the current M4 carbine [weight, 2.52 kg/ 5.56 pounds empty, 3.0 kg/ 6.6 lb with loaded 30 round magazine] The M16A1 had a 20-inch barrel [and better sights] part of the reason for its better accuracy and longer range. Those desiring accuracy from the Kalishnikov platform use the RPK version with its 24-inch long barrel and bipod, accurate on human targets well beyond 500 meters if things aren't too windy...under which condition the 55-grain M193 ammunition of the M16A1 is no great performer either.

The current M16A2 also has a 20-inch long barrel, but of heavier thickness, increasing its weight to about 9 pounds/ 4kg. Accordingly, the now-heavier M16A2 rifle and the now lighter former Soviet AKM weigh about the same, though variations in magazine capacity, accessories, magazine construction [aluminum, steel and plastic magazines are around for both weapons] can tip the scales half a pound or so either way for either rifle.

Online AK captured enemy equipment manual *here*

Interesting Vietnam-era M16 *comic book manual* *here*


159 posted on 04/19/2006 12:51:34 PM PDT by archy (I am General Tso. This is my Chief of Staff, Colonel Sanders....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson