|
|
Matty want a cracker???? |
Posted on 04/17/2006 5:36:45 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
by Mark Finkelstein
April 17, 2006
Darn it, when the MSM have a Republican in their sights, shouldn't he have the good grace to sit there and take it until he's hounded from office? That would appear to be the operative principle, judging by Today's coverage of the Rumsfeld flap. Much of the emphasis this morning was not so much on the substance of the controversy but on the fact that the Pentagon is fighting back against the calls for Rumsfeld's ouster.
Topping it all was the very first question that Matt Lauer posed to his guest, retired Marine Lt. General Mike DeLong, a Rumsfeld defender:
"Have you been asked by Secretary Rumsfeld to be here on his behalf?"
The answer, by the way, was 'no.' When Dem flacks, from James Carville to Paul Begala to countless others, make their TV rounds do MSM hosts inquire whether the DNC or a given Dem politician had asked them to appear? Yet here was Lauer leading his interview with a question that seemed designed to undercut DeLong's credibility.
Contrast this with the treatment Katie Couric accorded Rumsfeld critic John Batiste last week, described here. Couric invited the retired general to take a swipe at Pres. Bush; her only compaint was that Batiste hadn't come forward before with his criticism so that public opinion could be shaped "far earlier than you are now."
Lauer's question came after a set-up piece he introduced in this way: "On close-up, firing back. Defense secretary Rumsfeld's backers took to the air waves to defend him."
NBC's Pentagon correspondent Jim Miklaszewski sustained the drumbeat:
"The Pentagon now launched a full-blown public relations counter-offensive against the retired generals who called for Rumsfeld resignation. And the Secretary himself plans to use a previously scheduled meeting set for tomorrow with other retired generals and military analysts to prove he still has widespread support among the ranks.
"With Secretary Rumsfeld taking direct fire, the Pentagon is rallying the troops in his defense." A clip was then played of former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Richard Myers stating:
"It's wrong for the military to criticize our bosses. That's not the role of the military of the United States. It's inappropriate."
Continued Miklaszewski: "Last week only hours after President Bush issued a written statement supporting Rumsfeld, the Pentagon sent a memo to retired generals [claiming] in 2005 Defense Secretary Rumsfeld had 273 meetings with senior military commanders and 74 this year."
Highlights of DeLong's comments:
"He's tough to work with, he is a micro-manager, but he is very effective."
"From what I've seen, when we ran the war and the two people that worked the war with the Secretary were Tommy Franks and myself, when it came to matters of tactics and strategic thought, he went with us if there was any disagreement."
Lauer wasn't satisfied, suggesting that had Rumsfeld been a CEO, he'd be fired by now.
I'll keep that in mind next time I have some boards, a paintbrush, and a can of shellac. "Take that! And this!"
No prob.
If ya want to have some fun and have some extra $$$ to burn, get a few packs of magnetic printer paper, print out a hugh batch of these stickers and fling 'em like a frisbee at cars at random.
REALLY fun in hispanic neighborhoods and liberal bastions (like Boulder, Colorado -heh-heh!!)
I can see that you're a real troublemaker..........you have my respect. ;-)
Thanks.
How dare, Rummy, like GWB, protect himself with facts.
When Bush used facts to refute allegations of lies, bungling etc., he was "leaking".
Well, the only thing I see leaking (away) is what was left of msm credibility.
I think that's kind of the idea!
Great, where can we get them? How about the one with the WWII Vet holding a cup of Joe saying, "How 'bout rooting for Our side for a change".
Click on my name. You can make 'em yourself on your printer.
The question didn't just SEEM to be designed to undercut Marine Lt. General Mike DeLong's credibility,imo. I think it WAS OBVIOUS to anyone with half a brain that it was SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED with PRECISELY that intention. If the "prestigious" position of early morning talk show host and reader of interview questions had any credibility, it might have worked.
"Does Today Expect Rumsfeld to Sit Still for Shellacking?"
No! They expect him to resign!
Varnish is to shellac what Irish whisky is to Scotch, an inferior product cut with cheap grain alcohol.
Shellac'd furniture is so beautiful that knowledgable people stop and say, "Oh, is that shellac?"
Rarely seen anymore.
|
|
Matty want a cracker???? |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.