Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rhombus

I agree. We discuss this in "Patriot's History of the United States"---how the only solution that would have given the freedmen 40 acres and a mule legally would have been for Lincoln to label the rebels, well, rebels guilty of treason. Now, if he had done that, he could have given large-scale pardons to the vast majority of southerners and used it to break up the plantations of the wealthy slaveowner planters. It would have been legal, constitutional, and would have saved us all a LOT of trouble.


6 posted on 04/17/2006 8:31:13 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: LS

What would it have done to an economy that depended on cotton?


8 posted on 04/17/2006 8:32:54 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS

That, and actually educating and training former slaves in Civics.


17 posted on 04/17/2006 9:09:13 AM PDT by Dead Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: LS
Lincoln was an inclusionist, to my mind, he was a Southerner by birth, and only wanted to presue the traditional Wigg party line, National Bank and Federally sponsored internal improvements.

I personally do not think that he wanted a war, he said that repeatedly. He got one and if he had lived I think that the country would have been very different.

52 posted on 04/17/2006 2:24:53 PM PDT by Little Bill (A 37%'r, a Red Spot on a Blue State, rats are evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson