MSM on another witch hunt.
1 posted on
04/17/2006 6:02:04 PM PDT by
jdm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: jdm
2 posted on
04/17/2006 6:05:11 PM PDT by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
To: jdm
This is just a case of kids with their parents not crying and kids being held up by a stranger (even if it is the First Lady) bawling their lungs out.
To: jdm
Ah, the joys of idiot liberal propaganda.
The smirking drive-by apes always push their little "angle."
4 posted on
04/17/2006 6:08:38 PM PDT by
Reactionary
(The Barking of the Native Moonbat is the Sound of Moral Nitwittery)
To: jdm
Well, one set is being held by Laura Bush, a total stranger.
The other set is being held by Daddy, and .... ummm... daddy's "friend".
5 posted on
04/17/2006 6:12:28 PM PDT by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: jdm
All of us REAL parents know that the kids are just saving their bad behavior for their teen years. Better to let them get it out when they're young.
8 posted on
04/17/2006 6:14:45 PM PDT by
RandallFlagg
(Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
To: jdm
The gays kids don't look happy.. they looked CONFUSED! LOL
9 posted on
04/17/2006 6:16:29 PM PDT by
divine_moment_of_facts
("Liberals see what they believe... Conservatives believe what they see")
To: jdm
Gays Raising Kids = Gays Raising Other People's Kids.
11 posted on
04/17/2006 6:17:28 PM PDT by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 90-96)
To: jdm
No, but it does show that only poofers work as MSM reporters.
13 posted on
04/17/2006 6:20:15 PM PDT by
pissant
To: jdm
The colored leis are obnoxious.
18 posted on
04/17/2006 6:35:33 PM PDT by
fwdude
(If at first you don't succeed .......... form a committee and hire a consultant.)
To: jdm
If its Reuters its WRONG.
Note how the homosexuals use the children to advertise how the two men achiev sexual gratification.
21 posted on
04/17/2006 6:40:08 PM PDT by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: jdm
Why didn't they wear rainbow colored crucifixes instead of those stupid things. They look gay. Oops, I forgot!
26 posted on
04/17/2006 7:01:35 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: jdm
Pretty rainbow colored necklaces... to lure innocent young children to their gay lifestyle?
27 posted on
04/17/2006 7:11:38 PM PDT by
Kirkwood
To: jdm
Worse, almost all the couples shown were same-sex. Few normal couples were even shown with their children.
I guess we should also complain that they didn't identify opposite-sex couples directly.
And how did the women from Maryland end up with the same last name? The looked like identical twins. Are we allowing sisters to be "same-sex" couples now?
To: jdm
Selfish a$$hole$ trying to squeeze out the kids whose parents are heterosexual. They discriminate just as much as anyone.
29 posted on
04/17/2006 7:14:36 PM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
To: jdm
I'd seriously like to know if any homosexual couples attended that were NOT wearing a lei. By the photos shown, it didn't appear so. It would be a very telling fact to learn that no homosexual couples chose not to wear one - a testament to the homo-agendaist spirit that infects these creatures.
30 posted on
04/17/2006 7:15:46 PM PDT by
fwdude
(If at first you don't succeed .......... form a committee and hire a consultant.)
To: jdm
more like the kids know their mom and dad and want to be with their parents instead of strangers....
where as the other kids are probably passed around as party favors...
"oh look chip! look what we got! wanna hold it?"
( I know this is in terrible taste... but dang if the media can't bring out the worst in us...)
31 posted on
04/17/2006 7:16:40 PM PDT by
eeevil conservative
(I'm not racist- I'm an Equal Opportunity Enemy of ALL LAWBREAKING, TAX DODGING, FENCE CLIMBERS!)
To: jdm
Those kids with gay parents are in shock! If my parents were bone smokers I would be in shock too!
33 posted on
04/17/2006 7:53:00 PM PDT by
martinidon
(Bush won sKerry lost and Soro's is out millions for nothing!)
To: jdm
Freeper on a witch hunt. The story is about gay couples. All the kids are having a great time, except the ones being held be a stranger! So amazingly enough the first lady is holding a crying child while the parents are having a great day at the white house with their children.
Nothing to see here, move along.
Now the actual conspiracy would be if there were some photos of the first lady holding content happy children that were purposefully ommitted from the slideshow, but I can't find any. The whitehouse doesn't even have anything flattering posted
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/04/images/20060417-2_p041706pm-0057-1-515h.html34 posted on
04/17/2006 10:48:34 PM PDT by
Mephari
To: jdm
I hate to say it, but this is just plain creepy. Sick and twisted.
Poor kid.
36 posted on
04/18/2006 5:33:40 AM PDT by
wolficatZ
(The Honeysuckle Weeks Fan Club First Annual Pub Crawl!)
To: AFA-Michigan; AggieCPA; Agitate; AliVeritas; AllTheRage; An American In Dairyland; Annie03; ...
41 posted on
04/18/2006 11:42:02 AM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
