Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans in Horn of Africa Using New Weapon in Terror War
American Forces Press Service ^ | Jim Garamone

Posted on 04/18/2006 6:01:31 PM PDT by SandRat

AS SAYLIYAH, Qatar, April 18, 2006 – American forces are using an unconventional approach to fighting terrorism in the Horn of Africa, the senior enlisted adviser at U.S. Central Command said. "The weapon systems down there are well-drilling equipment and shovels, and building schools and hospitals, and training border patrols and counterterrorism forces," Air Force Command Chief Master Sgt. Curtis Brownhill said. "It's an elaborate civil affairs and security effort that is all about building capacity and confidence."

Combined Joint Task Force Horn of Africa is a small group of servicemembers who work with governments and U.S. officials in the Horn of Africa to improve life for some of the poorest people in the world. The task force is headquartered in Djibouti and includes operations in Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Uganda, Sudan and Yemen.

"We're fighting a war down there and haven't fired a shot," Brownhill said. "We're taking on al Qaeda and associated movements there, and it's the civil affairs piece that's winning it."

The roots of the effort go back to 2002. After coalition and Afghan forces routed the Taliban from Afghanistan and fractured al Qaeda in that country, extremists "needed ungoverned spaces to squirt to, and the Horn of Africa is ripe for that," the chief said.

Central Command representatives went to the Horn of Africa and worked with local governments, with U.S. embassies in the area, and with non-governmental relief agencies to give the people of the region hope. "With the civil affairs assets and training the militaries, (the task force) has provided confidence and capacity, and the people have pushed back from al Qaeda and associated movements trying to find another Afghanistan," Brownhill said.

There are still problems. Continued drought is forecast for the region, and Somalia remains the largest "ungoverned space" on the planet. Warlords rule in the nation, and some are reported to be embracing a Taliban-like rule. Warlords have encouraged piracy, and most are corrupt.

The task force does not work within Somalia. But its work on the periphery of the nation gives people in the region "the will and confidence to say to these groups, 'Not here; not today; not now.' We see a brighter future than a dark oppressed future under warlords of a Taliban-like government," he said.

Efforts in the Horn of Africa are all about building capacity, prosperity and setting conditions for progress. "You find that when you prepare the ground and set those conditions, often you preclude the necessity of having to go in and go to war," he said. "It's the preferred way of fighting."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: africa; americans; gwot; horn; hornofafrica; new; terror; war; weapon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 04/18/2006 6:01:34 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Does "winning the hearts and minds" really work? Honest question.


2 posted on 04/18/2006 6:03:03 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 91B; HiJinx; Spiff; MJY1288; xzins; Calpernia; TEXOKIE; windchime; Grampa Dave; freekitty; ...

and the armchair boys say we aren't adapting tactics....sheesh! What a bunch of noids -nyuck-nyuck-nyuck to the armchair boys complaining.


3 posted on 04/18/2006 6:03:10 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Sometimes.


4 posted on 04/18/2006 6:03:59 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Fair enough. Better than never.


5 posted on 04/18/2006 6:04:38 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

In the long run, yes.


6 posted on 04/18/2006 6:11:57 PM PDT by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con, American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

Slowly, it does work. And it makes a profound and fundamental change in the whole environment. But it does take time.


7 posted on 04/18/2006 6:16:11 PM PDT by Khurkris (Don't blame me. I was out the entire day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Khurkris
Slowly, it does work. And it makes a profound and fundamental change in the whole environment. But it does take time.

Exactly right -

8 posted on 04/18/2006 6:25:12 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad; SandRat
"...Does "winning the hearts and minds" really work? Honest question..."

It's a question that has an unyielding caveat to it. If the program goes on below the radar, and the MSM doesn't tumble to it, then it will of course have a good chance of working. In this case, I suspect that the MSM is too busy declaring defeat in Iraq to have devoted much poison to this 'well'.

The MSM knows that it is all a question of recruiting. If they suddenly started a campaign printing that "everyone in the region knows" that accepting help from the Americans is treachery to the national pride, and that only puppets help the imperialists, then eventually, under the propaganda bombardment, all of the good done by our help would sour.

The enemies of the U.S., as well as the Democratic party, (redundancy, I know), realize that the only way to keep recruits coming is to subvert and nullify anything that they perceive is an effective gain in our war on terror.

It is a matter of momentum. The liberals sense that the declaration of defeat in Iraq is enough to swing power their way. Their interests coincide with that of terrorists right now, and they figure that they can "get away with" the covert support by finessing that "it isn't really support for terrorism, since we obviously support our troops". It's simply that they must oppose everything that those troops have fought and died for, in order to make the world safe for re-distribution.

9 posted on 04/18/2006 6:29:57 PM PDT by pickrell (Old dog, new trick...sort of)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: IowaProf
I wonder why Israelis never chose this approach to fight terrorism.

They haven't? - Huh, their economy is only based off of Palestinians working within / among them - They just removed hundreds of Israeli families from their homes in order to give land away.....They pay millions and millions yearly to the Palestinians in Gaza ...the list could go on and on...

11 posted on 04/18/2006 7:08:45 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: IowaProf
Yeah but these are negotiated settlements. You do this, I will do that. Very often the palestinians simply don't live up to the contract at which point the cooperation of the Israelis also stop. There is nothing of that sorts going on here. We are simply being egalitarian hoping they wouldn't kill us if we give them stuff. We are not expanding freedom but the paternalistic welfare state.

You don't know what you are talking about. Winning the hearts and minds in Stan (and the Horn of Africa) is not at all creating a welfare state....it is a process that needs to be done in order for us to be successful (long-term...and short term). Additionally, you are completely wrong that there are not consequences for not living up to agreements with our guys on the ground. Just flat out wrong.

Furthermore Israel does not simply pull its offers (as you suggest)....they have been paying millions to the Palestinian Gov't for years now (all during attacks), they have an economy based off of Palestinian workers (all during attacks)....the reality is the Israelis do both type of Operations...use force but consistently look to win hearts and minds in the process.

14 posted on 04/18/2006 7:25:13 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
"We're fighting a war down there and haven't fired a shot," Brownhill said. "We're taking on al Qaeda and associated movements there, and it's the civil affairs piece that's winning it."

But, but, I thought that Bin Laden and his al-queda boys built schools, roads, and infrastructure. Our own esteemed mom-in-tennis-shoes senator, Patty Murray said so.

She surely knows what she's talking about, doesn't she?

(/sickening naivite)

15 posted on 04/18/2006 7:29:52 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: IowaProf
Oh really! Care to back it up with evidence? So far all I have seen is nation building with US tax-dollars. Do you have any other evidence for your claim.

Yeah, the reality of the values of freedom and self-worth spreading throughout both Iraq and Stan. Two Countries who become more and more capable each day - Two Countries who will be strong allies for decades to come.

Your silly notion that the monies we are spending here somehow create a welfare State is ridiculous. The savings from liberating these two nations and starting the beachhead of freedom in the Middle East will pay dividends for generations to come (at an unbelievable cheap price in comparison to the alternative).

Winning the hearts and minds of every day Afghanis and Iraqi's is key. It is very easy for those thousands and thousands of miles away to act like "who cares" what they think about us.....when it isn't you on the ground who's life is at risk...or who is trying to help create a new system of life for these people.

17 posted on 04/18/2006 7:38:00 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: johniegrad

Nope.

Never did, never will.

When the body count hits about 1/3 of the gross population, they start to see things a different way. I don't know why the body count has to be that high. It's just what history teaches. That's all.


19 posted on 04/18/2006 7:48:23 PM PDT by grayforkbeard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: IowaProf
I am not opposed to winning their hearts and minds, although the history of these places suggest we do it through our show of strength. The history of both places suggest that we have to win their hearts and mind by gaining their respect from our show of force. Giving them goodies didn't win hearts and minds in Europe, and it definitely won't win it there, in spite of your wishful thinking.

Wishful thinking my as$ (but that is neither here nor there). Nor did I ever say we shouldn't use force.

I said there is a role for both! If you are going to be effective in the long run (without question). Hell we rebuilt Europe and Japan (and we are still defending them 60 years later!!).

Additionally not every problem has the same solution. The Middle East is very different from both Europe and Asia.....those who don't understand this reality are simply lost.

Of course you use force (and we have) but once that has been established you use other (non-forceful methods) as much as possible...in order to win the trust and respect of those you are working with.

We have fought and continue to fight the most successful unconventional war in history.....Since Sept 11th, 2001 our enemies have suffered one strategic defeat after another...we have have not suffered one....This is by accident.

20 posted on 04/18/2006 7:52:02 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson