Posted on 04/20/2006 12:05:42 PM PDT by Caleb1411
Hmmm ~ so the old bat's unaware that instructing other people how to evade or break the law is usually a criminal offense.
She just keeps digging that hole deeper and deeper.
So she's not sorry she did it, she's just sorry she got caught.
I don't get this position. They were college age students, not minors. Seems like selective use of the law to me.
I certainly wouldn't charge them - assuming they were willing to cooperate in the case against their nutty professor.
I can't cite a source (could have been from Rush), but I believe she is being allowed to retire and will collect all retirement benefits.
She did not resign, simply went on terminal leave pending retirement.
Anyone, please correct me if I'm wrong.
"urged them to obtain attorneys and to resist being charged by police "
What does she want them to do, tell the police they refuse to accept the charges?
One point that has become clouded in the reporting of this is whether she is being allowed to retire as originally reported or whether she has resigned her post before her retirement. Next, what effect, if any, will this have on her pension?
She deserves to have her tenure and her pension stripped.
Does this sound like an apology?
The ex-professor said: "'Any violence perpetrated against that silly display was minor compared to how I felt when I saw it.'"
As with most members of the Far Left, she simply doesn't "get it"!
Her "violence" was not against the "silly display." It was against the principles and ideas of liberty embedded in our Constitution and its First Amendment.
She views "how I felt" when she "saw" crosses placed there by other citizens commemorating the untimely deaths of babies as a greater "violence" than her leading students in an act which trashed a most basic concept of our Constitution.
No apology here: just a defiant attempt to avoid justice.
She probably just read it on DU and passed it along without really thinking about it.
"You can make it hard to find you"
Isn't this obstruction of justice?
Frankly I think my picture of her is more appealing.
That Prof is going to get an education on how the Justice system works.
Can't she be charged under RICO.
Promoting baby killing and destroying crosses displays the madness mind of this prof kook....So much for the 'liberal' all-inclusive ideas of the university setting. This insecure liberal witch rejects the free speech of others...
she should be prosecuted for destroying property.
lol. Closeup vs. long shot!
"Another photo of the petite flower
doing her worst:"
Hey..its Humpty Dumpty's girlfriend......ahahahahaha..
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.