Replies

http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&file=print&sid=1203

Failed Clinton and Kerry Flunky Attacks Bolton
Date: Tuesday, 08 March 2005 (07:30:13) EST
Topic: President Bush

In a Washington Post editorial today (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A15521-2005Mar7.html), someone named Susan Rice attacks the nomination of John Bolton to be UN Ambassador. We've already told you why we love the nomination.

But what you may not know is just who exactly Dr. Susan Rice is, and why she should be the last person on earth to criticize Bolton.

First, let's look at some of Susan Rice's criticism of Bolton. In addition to her concerns about Bolton's dislike of such thinks as the International Criminal Court and the ABM Rice says:

Quote:

Bolton has testified against U.N. involvement in Congo, an inter-state conflict that has cost 3 million lives. He blasted the United Nations' concept of operations for its Ethiopia-Eritrea operation and rejected the U.N. civil administration missions in Kosovo and East Timor. Will Bolton undergo such a conversion on the road to First Avenue that he can effectively support U.N. peace operations?

Finally, Bolton criticized any " 'right of humanitarian intervention' to justify military operations to prevent ethnic cleansing or potential genocide." One must wonder how forcefully he will work to halt what the administration deems genocide in Darfur.

And just who is this woman?

Well we first wrote on Dr. Susan Rice back in August of 2004, when she was a "senior advisor" for the Kerry campaign, and in line to become his National Security Advisor. As we told you back then, Rice was national security record is disgraceful, as she was instrumental in the refusal of the US to accept Sudan's offer to hand over Bin Laden. Before shilling for Kerry she was a "senior adviser" to Howard Dean.
http://www.anklebitingpundits.com/index.php?name=News&file=article&sid=728

But it is perhaps most off putting when Ms. Rice discusses her concern for genocide in places like Darfur and the Congo, considering that while in the Clinton administration during the Rwanda crisis, she wondered first about the political ramifications of whether or not US Troops should go into Rwanda. And we all know how that turned out.
http://www.nationalreview.com/geraghty/geraghty200312190845.asp

But I'm glad she wrote this piece. It again reminds us why the American people made the right decision in November. Dr. Susan Rice is far less dangerous to our national security writing in the Washington Post than she would have been looking after our security.