Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RandallFlagg

I am asking this out of a sincere desire to understand, not to be sarcastic or liberal. I'm ignorant about this because I don't smoke. Here goes:

Why would restaurants go out of business because no smoking is permitted? Don't smokers still get just as hungry? Don't nonsmokers go out to eat? In an upscale place like Howard County, most people don't smoke anyway, so I wouldn't think the customer base in Columbia would be much affected by a smoking ban. As it is you hardly see anybody smoking anymore, except for the poor, who aren't a big source of revenue to Howard County restaurant owners.

I am not trying to argue, just trying to understand.


8 posted on 04/22/2006 8:02:44 AM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Fairview

bump


(so I can watch you catch it) ;9)


9 posted on 04/22/2006 8:10:29 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Fairview
Why would restaurants go out of business because no smoking is permitted?

Because the bar business dries up.

In CT, the bar business went to the indian casinos or private clubs (both of which are allowed to have smoking). The rest of the bars saw huge declines in customers and revenues...and tables full of people who stay all night and drink one soda.

For whatever reason, it seems that non-smokers do not drink as much or go to bars as often as smokers.

10 posted on 04/22/2006 8:44:44 AM PDT by Dr.Syn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Fairview; Ditter; SheLion
Sorry it took so long. I'm at work and I got a little busy.

Why would restaurants go out of business because no smoking is permitted?

If the resturant has 60-70% smokers who are it's customers, the customers go elsewhere.

Don't smokers still get just as hungry?

We sure do.

Don't nonsmokers go out to eat?

I wouldn't know. I'm not a nonsmoker.

In an upscale place like Howard County, most people don't smoke anyway, so I wouldn't think the customer base in Columbia would be much affected by a smoking ban.

Are you advocating the dismissal of the few for the many?

As it is you hardly see anybody smoking anymore, except for the poor, who aren't a big source of revenue to Howard County restaurant owners.

Then why is the president of the Howard County Restaurant Association argung against the ban?

I am not trying to argue, just trying to understand.

No prob.

(so I can watch you catch it) ;9)

Catch what?

Perhaps you have more data on this, SheLion?
13 posted on 04/22/2006 10:13:50 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Fairview; RandallFlagg; SheLion

Why would restaurants go out of business because no smoking is permitted?




Because I will not pay to go to reform school.


30 posted on 04/22/2006 9:03:23 PM PDT by The Foolkiller (BSXL* The year the NFL became irrelevant..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson