Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dump Cheney for Condi, Bush urged (London Times)
London Times ^ | 4/23/06 | Sarah Baxter

Posted on 04/22/2006 6:42:26 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: kellynla
Personally, I like Cheney/Rice for 2008 I know, I know...Cheney says he's not running...

Me too. The only way i can see Condi replacing Cheney is if his health were to deteriorate any further. I'm a big fan of Dr. Rice and Vice President Cheney.


21 posted on 04/22/2006 7:34:31 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

22 posted on 04/22/2006 7:50:41 PM PDT by Chode (1967 UN Outer Space Treaty is bad for America and bad for humanity - DUMP IT. American Hedonist ©®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Gee, where is it in the Constitution that the President of the United States can force the Vice-President to resign his Office? Last I checked they were both elected individually and took an oath to perform their duties until the end of their terms...


Beltway fantasy aside - Cheney would be a fool to set such a precedent for the future...


dvwjr
23 posted on 04/22/2006 7:58:12 PM PDT by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

>REPUBLICANS are urging President George W Bush to dump Dick Cheney as vice-president and replace him with Condoleezza Rice <

Dick Cheney was elected. Bush can't dump him.

Stupid Brits.


24 posted on 04/22/2006 8:06:29 PM PDT by Darnright (Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr

And Cheney is NOT a fool!


25 posted on 04/22/2006 8:08:16 PM PDT by Birdlady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: marron
Rice as VP for Bush's third term?

SECOND term. Don't you listen?

He was SELECTED not ELECTED for the first four years!

Sarcasm off, just in case.

26 posted on 04/22/2006 8:11:47 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Darnright
I like Cheney where he is now, and Bush can't make him resign, as you point out.

If any change were to be made, I would have Cheney and Rumsfeld change places, so that Rumsfeld would be well-placed to run for President in 2008, but that would require two confirmations, and I'm not sure they would get through. I'd rather have Rumsfeld than Rice as the Republican nominee in 2008.

27 posted on 04/22/2006 8:13:52 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

OUTSTANDING SUGGESTION!!!

Nicholas Burns can replace Dr. Rice very capably - in fact he's been out there quite a lot this week.

In preparation, perhaps?


28 posted on 04/22/2006 8:14:54 PM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
True or they pretend they do not.

The VP has stated he will see his term out and IMHO he will

To compile with "my" rules on Cheney threads here are a couple of pics.


29 posted on 04/22/2006 8:19:55 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
Napping my foot he was looking at notes

He is a man that likes to be well prepared and always has reams of notes with him, notice whenever in a meeting he has more notes than anyone even the President.

He often attends joint meetings with the President but often not reported as the official photo ops only show the President he has already slipped out before the press enter.

I suspect he was either due to go back into another meeting or was reading up on notes whilst fresh in his mind whilst the press nonsense was going on. Much more useful that paying attention to that.

30 posted on 04/22/2006 8:25:33 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
but I’d like to anoint somebody

Freudian press slip?

31 posted on 04/22/2006 8:27:32 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Just think of the confirmation hearings not even worth considering for that reason alone plus also why replace as has been said many times the best VP in history if viewed as that position as stand alone and not a stepping stone to anything else.
32 posted on 04/22/2006 8:27:55 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dvwjr

Absolutely and VP Cheney is no ones fool


33 posted on 04/22/2006 8:28:38 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Darnright

The American press has said as well so not just stupid Brits


34 posted on 04/22/2006 8:29:10 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: manwiththehands

The English seem incapable of understanding the American constitutional system. The last Veep to resign was John C. Calhoun and that was because Jackson had a personal beef with him.


35 posted on 04/22/2006 8:31:33 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: snugs
Best d*mn Veep I've ever seen - and I'm a old granny


36 posted on 04/22/2006 8:32:41 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: snugs
Now Ruthie, with her head down on the railing, snoozing away while the SCOTUS was in session - THAT's napping.

But that got skipped over pretty fast...

37 posted on 04/22/2006 8:35:19 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time," Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
No we are not and enough Americans have said similar to get me to ask the same question that many Americans seem incapable of understanding their own constitutional system.
38 posted on 04/22/2006 8:35:23 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7
I would love to see a photo of that LOL.
39 posted on 04/22/2006 8:36:18 PM PDT by snugs (An English Cheney Chick - BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: snugs

>The American press has said as well so not just stupid Brits<

Stupid American press is an oxymoron. I'd have thought the British press would have had more sense.

But then again, they're journalists.


40 posted on 04/22/2006 8:39:28 PM PDT by Darnright (Remember that a lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson