Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chuck54

Thanks for the welcome. But I do recall a federal investigation of White House personnel and an indictment of Libby resulting from the leak. Do I have my facts wrong?


14 posted on 04/23/2006 8:14:03 PM PDT by PubliusToo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: PubliusToo

Libby was not indicted for leaking.


15 posted on 04/23/2006 8:21:17 PM PDT by Slicksadick (Go out on a limb........Its where the fruit is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PubliusToo

"But I do recall a federal investigation of White House personnel and an indictment of Libby resulting from the leak. Do I have my facts wrong?"

Nobody is being charged with any crime related to leaking. Libby is being charged for lying or bending about what he said to some reporters.

We don't know who leaked to Novak. The prosecution won't talk, won't release the info to Libby. After the leak Novak confirmed the info with two others, Rove and some CIA press handler. According to Novak on or both of them asked him not to reveal the information. But Novak did anyway.


16 posted on 04/23/2006 8:21:25 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: PubliusToo

You may need to read that memo again. Libby was "indicted" for being less than truthful to a grand jury, not for leaking a name.

No one has been indicted for "leaking" the name of a CIA clerk who was btw not a secret agent.

Stick around and you'll get a better education than you're accustomed to over at Dummies Unhinged.

Trust me.


18 posted on 04/23/2006 8:23:15 PM PDT by Chuck54 (4/23/06 The day Juan Williams "jumped the shark" on FNS,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson