To: jveritas
I am probably just being more dense than usual here but what is new in these documents? They obviously ordered the tubes but I don't think that was ever in doubt.
What is in this info that would lead someone to believe that they were to be used for centrifuging and not as rocket parts?
17 posted on
04/24/2006 10:05:08 AM PDT by
Straight Vermonter
(The Stations of the Cross in Poetry ---> http://www.wayoftears.com)
To: Straight Vermonter
No direct information but I doubt very much that they were going to be used to manufacture 50,000 81 mm Howitzer, not ammunition for Howitzer but the Howitzer launcher itself. Do you know about any army who possesses 50,000 81 mm Howitzer Launchers?
26 posted on
04/24/2006 10:17:06 AM PDT by
jveritas
(Hate can never win elections.)
To: Straight Vermonter
What is in this info that would lead someone to believe that they were to be used for centrifuging and not as rocket parts? It's not necessarily here, but if you combine the tubes, 500 tons of uranium at Tuwaitha, Mahdi Obeidi's book The Bomb in my Garden, and A.Q. Khan's proliferation of nuclear know-how across the Middle East, it's a short trip to realization.
29 posted on
04/24/2006 10:19:24 AM PDT by
edpc
To: Straight Vermonter
It certainly looks suspicious and something that could be WMD-related, but I am going to leave this one out of a column I am writing about the translated documents due to the lack of hard evidence.
66 posted on
04/24/2006 11:18:58 AM PDT by
rwfromkansas
(http://xanga.com/rwfromkansas)
To: Straight Vermonter
The high degree of accuracy in the milling and the surface coating for one.
220 posted on
04/25/2006 9:37:19 AM PDT by
justshutupandtakeit
(If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson