Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

"The actions came after months in which the NRA had claimed, in court and in press releases, that the city and its police department unlawfully disarmed citizens in the face of lawlessness and thuggery after the storm."

Note the use of the word "claimed." It wasn't a "claim." The police were clearly and obviously in flagrant violation of both the law and the constitution.

"Police this week began returning the guns, but Superintendent Warren Riley said most of the weapons were not taken from the hands of gun owners. Instead, he said they were seized from empty homes where evacuees left them behind, to prevent looters from getting their hands on them."

Bull chips. Period. Bare-faced, unabashed lie. Period. Moreover, how does that excuse anything? What were police dong rummaging around in people's homes without a warrant...?


6 posted on 04/24/2006 10:32:25 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jack Hammer

Sorry. Should read "...what were the police doing..."


7 posted on 04/24/2006 10:33:51 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson