To: ElkGroveDan
We have no evidence that the man is going to sell uss down the road on every issue we care about. You are protesting not having evidence of that? Well...O.K.
46 posted on
04/25/2006 1:44:53 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
You are protesting not having evidence of that? Well...O.K. My point was that there is no reason to tarnish the man by comparing him to Arnold. Yes, of course Arnold sold us out on everything Republicans stand for, but as I said, there is no proof Grammer is going to. So that makes it unfair to compare the two (for now).
56 posted on
04/25/2006 1:58:33 PM PDT by
ElkGroveDan
(California bashers will be called out)
To: lepton; ElkGroveDan
You are protesting not having evidence of that? Well...O.K.Actually, Dan was saying it was unfair to compare Grammer to Schwarzenegger, since Schwarzenegger "[sold us] down the road on every issue we care about."
In other words, it's a jab at Schwarzenegger.
57 posted on
04/25/2006 1:59:07 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson